Wells Fargo Auto Insurance: Understanding The Charges

Wells Fargo has been involved in a number of scandals relating to its auto insurance practices. In 2017, it was revealed that the bank had charged hundreds of thousands of auto-loan borrowers for insurance they did not ask for or need, in some cases causing those customers' cars to be repossessed. This was not an isolated incident, as Wells Fargo has since disclosed more customer abuses in businesses including mortgage lending, wealth management, and auto loans. The bank has faced strong backlash and has had to pay millions of dollars in fines and compensation to affected customers.

Wells Fargo charged customers for auto insurance they didn't need

Wells Fargo has been accused of charging customers for auto insurance they did not need. An internal bank investigation, spurred by customer complaints, found that between 2012 and 2017, about 570,000 borrowers may have been wrongly pushed into auto insurance policies. The issue centred on so-called collateral protection insurance policies, which are similar to auto insurance policies commonly taken out by vehicle owners to cover the costs of damage to their vehicles.

In some cases, Wells Fargo failed to notify customers that it was buying these policies on their behalf, even though the customers already had their own insurance. The expense of this unneeded insurance pushed roughly 274,000 Wells Fargo customers into delinquency and resulted in almost 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessions.

Wells Fargo acknowledged its failure to manage the insurance program properly and apologised for any harm caused to its customers. The bank said it would start refunding about $80 million to customers, with each customer receiving around $140. The bank also said it would work with credit bureaus to correct customers' credit records.

In addition to the refunds, Wells Fargo agreed to pay at least $393.5 million to those who were force-placed into auto insurance. This settlement includes a refund for unnecessary insurance premiums, interest charges, and car repossession costs. The settlement also provides for eligible class members to receive credit report adjustments for negative credit marks resulting from the unwanted auto insurance.

Customers were pushed into unnecessary auto insurance

Wells Fargo has been accused of charging customers for unnecessary auto insurance, which in some cases caused their cars to be repossessed. An internal bank investigation, spurred by customer complaints, found that between 2012 and 2017, about 570,000 borrowers may have been wrongly pushed into these auto insurance policies. The issue centres on so-called "collateral protection insurance policies", which are similar to regular auto insurance policies taken out by vehicle owners to cover the costs of damage to their vehicles. While Wells Fargo and other lenders typically require that auto-loan customers have such policies, and will buy a policy on the customer's behalf if they do not have one, in this case, Wells Fargo acknowledged that it improperly bought such policies for customers who already had their own insurance.

The expense of the unneeded insurance pushed roughly 274,000 Wells Fargo customers into delinquency and resulted in almost 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessions, including those of military service members on active duty. Wells Fargo has agreed to pay $300 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit claiming the bank hid that it had pushed unnecessary insurance on auto loan customers. The bank has also said it will refund customers a total of $80 million, with those who lost their vehicles receiving an average of $800 in compensation.

Wells Fargo charged for unneeded auto insurance, then repossessed cars

Wells Fargo has been accused of charging customers for unnecessary auto insurance and then repossessing their cars. An internal investigation by the bank found that between 2012 and 2017, about 570,000 borrowers may have been wrongly pushed into auto insurance policies. The issue centred on so-called collateral protection insurance policies, which are similar to auto insurance policies taken out by vehicle owners to cover the costs of damage to their vehicles. Wells Fargo and other lenders typically require that auto-loan customers have such policies.

In this case, Wells Fargo acknowledged that it improperly bought such policies on behalf of customers who already had their own insurance and, in some cases, failed to notify those customers. The bank blamed the problem on inadequate checks and balances and flaws in the systems of the company that handled the insurance policies, National General Insurance.

As a result of the unnecessary insurance costs, about 20,000 customers defaulted on their car loans and had their vehicles repossessed. Wells Fargo allotted $16 million for this group, which works out to an average refund of $800. The bank also promised to correct errors in customers' credit records caused by the scandal.

In total, Wells Fargo plans to give affected customers $80 million in refunds and compensation. The bank's primary regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency, declined to comment on the scandal. However, New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer, who helped lead an unsuccessful campaign to unseat Wells Fargo directors, called for the board to be overhauled, saying, "This is a full-blown scandal – again. It's unbelievable, outrageous, sad, and yet quintessential Wells Fargo."

The scandal is the latest in a long line of controversies for Wells Fargo, which has been accused of creating millions of unauthorized checking and credit card accounts, signing customers up for unauthorized insurance policies, improperly modifying mortgages, and charging mortgage borrowers unnecessary fees. In 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Wells Fargo to pay over $2 billion in redress to consumers and a $1.7 billion civil penalty for widespread mismanagement of auto loans, mortgages, and deposit accounts.

Wells Fargo's plan to repay insurance customers was rejected

Wells Fargo has been involved in a long-running sales scandal, which came to light in September 2016. It was revealed that the bank had opened millions of accounts in customers' names without their permission to meet aggressive sales targets. Since then, Wells Fargo has disclosed multiple instances of customer abuse in businesses including mortgage lending, wealth management, and auto loans.

In 2017, it was discovered that Wells Fargo charged hundreds of thousands of auto-loan borrowers for insurance they did not ask for or need. This issue centered on so-called collateral-protection insurance policies, which are similar to auto insurance policies that vehicle owners take out to cover the costs of damage to their vehicles. While Wells Fargo requires that auto-loan customers have such policies, the bank acknowledged that it improperly bought these policies on behalf of customers who already had their own insurance. This resulted in customers facing overdraft fees, damaged credit, or vehicle repossession.

Wells Fargo initially estimated that it would need to pay $64 million to compensate customers, but lawyers for the drivers stated that this amount was too low. The bank then proposed a plan to repay customers as part of a $1 billion settlement with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC). However, U.S. regulators rejected this plan, stating that Wells Fargo needed to do more to ensure that all affected drivers were identified and compensated. The OCC wanted to see the work behind the bank's calculations and an explanation of how workers were performing day-to-day remediation tasks.

Wells Fargo's proposal included contacting around 600,000 drivers and providing refunds and compensation totaling $80 million. The bank also planned to work with credit bureaus to correct customers' credit records. While Wells Fargo's plan was rejected, it is not unusual for banks and regulators to haggle over the fine print of a settlement, and large banks typically satisfy regulator demands quickly after a large penalty.

Wells Fargo charged for auto insurance without notifying customers

Wells Fargo has been accused of charging customers for auto insurance they did not need and, in some cases, failing to notify them of these additional charges. This issue came to light in July 2017, when it was revealed that about 570,000 borrowers may have been wrongly pushed into these auto insurance policies. The bank acknowledged that it had improperly bought such policies on behalf of customers who already had their own insurance. This resulted in hundreds of thousands of customers being charged for duplicate coverage, with some facing overdraft fees, damaged credit, or even vehicle repossession as a result.

An internal investigation by Wells Fargo found that, between 2012 and 2017, the bank had charged customers for unnecessary auto insurance, which is similar to policies commonly taken out by vehicle owners to cover costs of damage to their vehicles. In some cases, Wells Fargo failed to properly notify customers that it was purchasing this insurance on their behalf, even though state insurance regulations required them to do so. This meant that many customers were unaware that they were being charged for duplicate coverage.

As a result of these improper practices, Wells Fargo agreed to pay a settlement of $393.5 million to affected customers. The settlement checks were mailed out to eligible customers, with payments based on the impact that the unwanted insurance had on their accounts. This included refunds for unnecessary insurance premiums, interest charges, and car repossession costs. The settlement also provided for eligible customers to receive credit report adjustments for negative credit marks resulting from the unwanted auto insurance.

In addition to the financial impact, Wells Fargo also faced significant reputational damage as a result of this scandal. The bank, which is one of the largest in the United States, has been working to repair its image and regain the trust of its customers. Wells Fargo has since implemented changes and review processes to identify and fix problems and be more transparent with its customers.

Frequently asked questions