Farmers Insurance's Political Leanings: Unraveling The Ties With The Republican Party

The insurance industry is a major contributor to federal election campaigns in the United States, with insurance companies, agents, and brokers spending more than $58.7 million on federal parties and candidates during the 2012 election cycle. In 2016, the Republican Party received $19.7 million in donations from the insurance industry, compared to $9.6 million for the Democratic Party. While the insurance industry's political contributions have historically favoured Republican candidates and the Republican Party, there is variation among different insurance companies. For example, Farmers Insurance Group, a property and casualty insurance company, contributed 60.25% of its PAC donations to Republicans and 39.75% to Democrats during the 2019-2020 election cycle. Additionally, insurance companies have been known to contribute to political action committees (PACs) affiliated with specific candidates, such as Farmers Insurance Group's contributions to the PAC of Republican gubernatorial candidate Greg Abbott in Texas.

Farmers Insurance's political donations

Farmers Insurance Group, a property and casualty insurance company, has been known to make political donations through its Political Action Committee (PAC). In 2014, amid a decade-long legal battle with the state of Texas over homeowners' insurance rates, the company's PAC donated $50,000 to the gubernatorial campaign of Attorney General Greg Abbott, the top lawyer in the state's case against Farmers Insurance. This contribution brought Abbott's total receipts from the PAC to over $75,000 since 2013. Critics argued that Abbott had not fairly represented Texas homeowners in the lawsuit, despite his assertions that accepting the campaign money did not create a conflict of interest.

According to data released by the Federal Election Commission and analysed by OpenSecrets, Farmers Group, Inc. has made political contributions to both Democratic and Republican candidates. Between 2019 and 2020, 39.75% of their contributions went to Democrats, while 60.25% went to Republicans. This aligns with the broader trend of the insurance industry's political donations, which tend to favour Republican candidates. For example, in the 2012 election cycle, 68% of the insurance industry's contributions went to Republicans.

In addition to Farmers Insurance Group, other insurance companies have also been active in political donations. For instance, Starr Companies spent more than $15 million on conservative groups from 2015 to 2016, making it the top spender in the insurance industry during that period. Other notable spenders in the industry include New York Life Insurance, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, AFLAC Inc., and Metlife Inc., each contributing over $1 million during the same timeframe.

The insurance industry's spending on politics extends beyond campaign contributions. In 2013, the industry spent more than $154 million on federal lobbying efforts, addressing issues such as flood insurance, terrorism risk insurance, data security, and aspects of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Health and life insurance companies tend to allocate more of their spending towards lobbying, while property and casualty insurance companies tend to focus on donations to parties, political action groups, and individual candidates.

The Republican Party's reliance on insurance industry donations

The insurance industry is a major contributor to federal election campaigns in the United States, and the Republican Party has been the primary recipient of these donations. In 2012, 68% of the insurance industry's political contributions went to the Republican Party, totalling $58.7 million. This trend continued into the 2016 election cycle, with the industry on track to surpass its previous record and the Republican Party receiving $19.7 million compared to the Democratic Party's $9.6 million.

One notable example of an insurance company contributing to the Republican Party is Farmers Insurance Group. In 2014, amid a decade-long legal battle with the state of Texas over homeowners' insurance rates, the company's employees' PAC donated $50,000 to the gubernatorial campaign of Attorney General Greg Abbott, who was the top lawyer in the state's case against Farmers Insurance. This contribution raised questions about a potential conflict of interest, as Abbott was accused of not fairly representing Texas homeowners in the lawsuit.

Another insurance company with strong ties to the Republican Party is Starr Companies, which spent more than $15 million on conservative groups from 2015 to 2016. Overall, independent agents within the insurance industry are among the sector's most right-leaning groups, with over 70% of their contributions going to Republican candidates and the Republican Party.

The insurance industry's spending in politics extends beyond campaign contributions, as companies also invest significant amounts in lobbying efforts. In 2013, the industry spent more than $154 million on federal lobbying, addressing issues such as flood insurance, terrorism risk insurance, data security, and aspects of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Health, life, property, and auto insurance companies, along with agents and brokers, all play a role in influencing policy through their financial contributions.

The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), a powerful agricultural organization and lobbying group, further illustrates the Republican Party's reliance on insurance industry donations. While the AFBF itself does not sell insurance, the majority of its non-profit state affiliates have affiliated for-profit insurance companies. The insurance affiliates have significant financial entanglements, with investments in major food industry players such as Cargill, ConAgra, and Tyson. The AFBF has been a strong opponent of climate change regulation and taxation, aligning with conservative groups and the fossil fuel industry to block climate action.

In summary, the Republican Party has benefited significantly from donations and lobbying efforts by the insurance industry. Companies like Farmers Insurance Group and Starr Companies, along with independent agents, have directed their financial contributions towards Republican candidates and causes. The insurance industry's influence extends beyond elections, as evidenced by the AFBF's successful lobbying against climate change policies. The Republican Party's reliance on these donations highlights the industry's impact on politics and policy-making in the United States.

Farmers Insurance's donations to Greg Abbott

Farmers Insurance Group has donated substantial sums of money to Greg Abbott, the Republican attorney general of Texas and, as of 2014, gubernatorial candidate. In 2014, Abbott was the top lawyer in the state's case against Farmers Insurance regarding a decade-long legal fight over homeowners' insurance rates. Despite this, the company's employees' PAC gave $50,000 to Abbott's gubernatorial campaign, taking his receipts in the race to over $75,000 since 2013. This was amid a 2002 lawsuit, in which the state of Texas alleged that Farmers Insurance had deceived and discriminated against Texas homeowners by charging them for natural disasters in other states and using credit history as a significant factor in setting premiums without disclosing this to customers. Then-Attorney General John Cornyn estimated that the company owed policyholders up to $140 million.

In response to the lawsuit, Farmers Insurance threatened to pull out of Texas, where it controlled about 20% of the home insurance market. The company claimed that doing business in the state would no longer be profitable and that it had lost over $1 billion in Texas over two years. Despite this, Abbott's ties to Farmers Insurance became an issue in his 2002 race to succeed Cornyn. When it was revealed that Farmers Insurance was among the hosts of a fundraiser for Abbott's campaign, he pledged to return all contributions from the company, stating that he was unaware of the state's investigation. However, a preliminary settlement between Farmers Insurance and the state was approved by a Travis County judge in 2003, five months after Abbott took office.

Consumer advocates appealed the settlement, arguing that it was unfavorable to policyholders. Private individuals who hired their own lawyers were reported to have received much better outcomes than those represented by the state. The settlement is still pending, and critics argue that it is too lenient on Farmers Insurance as it does not require the company to pay interest on the $117 million settlement amount, despite the case having sat dormant for over a decade.

In total, the Farmers Employees PAC has given more than $100,000 to Abbott since 2002, according to state campaign finance records. Abbott and his campaign have defended these contributions, stating that he does not treat donors differently when applying the law and that accepting campaign donations does not create a conflict of interest. However, critics argue that Abbott has not fairly represented Texas homeowners and that his actions demonstrate the influence of special interests in Texas politics.

The American Farm Bureau Federation's political lobbying

The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) is a United States-based agricultural organisation and lobbying group. It was founded in 1919 and represents the 2 million farms in the United States. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has affiliates in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

The AFBF is among the agriculture industry's largest lobby groups. Its federal lobbying efforts, which began in the 1930s, are believed to have contributed to the shift towards larger farms. The organisation has been criticised for prioritising the interests of large farms and corporate interests over small farmers.

In 2022, the AFBF spent $2,120,000 on lobbying, including for policies benefiting the for-profit activities of state farm bureaus, such as federal subsidies for crop insurance sold by affiliate companies. The AFBF itself does not sell insurance, but most of its revenue comes from dues paid by its nearly 5.9 million members, most of whom are insurance customers rather than farmers.

The AFBF has been accused of recruiting political candidates, mostly Republicans, to influence legislative elections and appointments to state committees. It has also been a vocal opponent of climate change regulation and taxation, only ceasing to publicly deny climate change in 2019.

The AFBF wields significant influence at both the federal and state levels. It is the most powerful institution representing rural Americans and spends more than any other organisation on lobbying the federal government on agricultural issues. State-level Farm Bureaus also hold considerable sway in state legislatures due to their extensive resources and large membership base.

The AFBF's lobbying efforts are guided by policies adopted at its annual convention, which is attended by farmer and rancher delegates from across the United States. The organisation provides leadership development and outreach training to strengthen the ability of farmers and ranchers to connect with their communities and elected leaders.

The AFBF's programs and initiatives aim to enrich rural communities and bridge the gap between farmers and consumers. It also offers resources and support to address issues such as mental health and disaster relief in farming communities.

The insurance industry's political spending in 2016

The insurance industry is a major contributor to federal campaigns, and this was especially true during the 2016 election cycle. The industry was on track to surpass the record $58.7 million it spent on federal parties and candidates during the 2012 season. This included spending more than $154 million on federal lobbying efforts in 2013, on issues such as flood insurance, terrorism risk insurance, data security, and the Affordable Care Act.

During the 2016 election cycle, the insurance industry contributed heavily to both major parties, but the Republican Party received significantly more financial support. By 2016, the industry had given more to the Republican Party in every election cycle since 1990, except for 1990 itself, when the Democrats received slightly more. In 2016, the Republican Party received $19.7 million compared to the Democratic Party's $9.6 million.

The top spender in the insurance industry from 2015 through 2016 was Starr Companies, which contributed over $15 million to conservative groups. Other top spenders in the insurance industry during this period included New York Life Insurance, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, AFLAC Inc., and Metlife Inc., each of which contributed over $1 million.

In addition to contributions to federal campaigns, the insurance industry also plays a significant role in state-level politics, particularly in races for insurance commissioner and governor. During the 2016 election cycle, the industry pumped more than $6 million into political efforts aimed at a dozen races for these offices. The industry's influence is particularly notable in states where the governor appoints the state's insurance regulator.

Frequently asked questions