Life Insurance Proceeds: Marital Property Or Separate Asset?

Whether life insurance proceeds are considered marital property depends on the state laws that control the policy and if the policy is subject to federal, state, and community property law. In community property states, a spouse is automatically considered the life insurance beneficiary unless they indicate otherwise in the policy. All property acquired during the marriage is considered jointly owned by both spouses, regardless of who earned it or whose name is on the title. However, in the case of Goodwin v. Goodwin, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found that life insurance proceeds received by one spouse during the marriage were not marital assets.

Life insurance proceeds are not marital assets

In the United States, whether or not life insurance proceeds are considered marital assets depends on the state in which the divorce takes place and the type of life insurance policy in question.

In community property states, a life insurance policy will almost certainly be subject to distribution in a divorce if the couple paid premiums with joint funds while married. There are nine community property states in the US: Washington, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Wisconsin, and Arizona. In these states, the policy's cash value is subject to marital property rules, and the asset is divided equally.

However, in the 2020 case of Goodwin v. Goodwin, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found that life insurance proceeds received by one spouse during the marriage were not marital assets. This case is notable because, despite the divorce code being in effect since 1980, the courts had not previously addressed this issue directly. In this case, the wife was the sole beneficiary of her son's four life insurance policies, which totalled approximately $600,000. The court found that these proceeds were not marital assets because the policies came from the son's earnings/assets and not from any monetary contribution by either spouse.

In non-community property states, a judge must determine if the life insurance was "commingled" and should be shared in a divorce. If a spouse was the original beneficiary or if joint funds paid the premiums, the life insurance is typically considered an asset to be divided in a divorce. However, for term life insurance, there is no cash value or dividend to call an asset, so there is nothing to divide. In these cases, state laws vary on whether an ex-spouse remains a death benefit beneficiary post-divorce.

Additionally, some states have revocation-upon-divorce statutes that automatically invalidate an ex-spouse's benefit once the divorce is final. This is the case in South Carolina and approximately half of US states. These revocation laws prevent an ex-spouse from claiming a portion of the death benefit when the insured spouse dies.

Overall, the treatment of life insurance proceeds during a divorce varies depending on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.

Life insurance proceeds as gifts

Life insurance proceeds are generally not considered marital property. However, in community property states, the policyholder's spouse is automatically considered the beneficiary, and the proceeds may be treated as marital assets. In these states, the policyholder must receive the spouse's permission to list anyone else as the beneficiary.

In a recent case in Pennsylvania, a court found that life insurance proceeds received by one spouse during the marriage were not marital assets. The wife was the sole beneficiary of her son's life insurance policies, and the court determined that the proceeds were a gift to her and not marital property. This case highlights the complexity of determining whether life insurance proceeds are considered marital property, especially when gifts are involved.

Life insurance can be given as a gift in several ways. One way is to designate the recipient as a beneficiary of your own life insurance policy. This allows you to retain control of the policy while ensuring that the recipient receives the death benefit upon your death. Alternatively, you can transfer ownership of your policy to the recipient, giving them the ability to make policy changes and name beneficiaries. Transferring ownership may also provide tax benefits, especially if the recipient is a charity.

Another option is to purchase a new policy for someone else, which can be an excellent way to guarantee insurability for a young relative or provide protection against unknown health risks. When establishing a new policy, you will need to provide proof of insurable interest, the recipient's consent and personal information, and potentially a medical exam. It is important to note that either the gift giver or the recipient will need to continue paying insurance premiums to keep the policy active.

Gifting life insurance can be a valuable way to maintain financial security for your loved ones and provide them with peace of mind. It can also help reduce the donor's taxable estate, saving estate taxes for upper-income taxpayers. Additionally, naming a charity as a beneficiary ensures privacy and cannot be contested by family members or other heirs.

Life insurance proceeds and community property laws

Life insurance proceeds and the laws of community property can be a complex area, and it is always best to seek legal advice for your specific situation. However, here is some general information about how these two areas intersect.

In the United States, there are nine states that are community property jurisdictions: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In these states, property accumulated during a marriage is generally considered to be jointly owned and is split equally. This includes income, property purchased with that income, and life insurance policies. So, in these community property states, the policyholder's spouse is automatically considered the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, and they must receive their spouse's permission to list anyone else.

However, there are nuances to these laws. For example, if a couple moves from a community property state to a non-community property state, their property may still be considered community property by the IRS unless they take specific actions. Additionally, the status of income from separate property varies among community property states, with some considering it separate and others considering it community property.

Furthermore, the treatment of life insurance proceeds as marital property depends on various factors. While life insurance proceeds are not considered an inheritance, they may be considered a gift, which is usually treated as separate property. Courts consider factors such as whether there was a contractual right to the proceeds, ownership of the policy, and marital contribution to the premiums to determine if life insurance proceeds are separate or marital property.

In summary, the laws of community property states have a significant impact on life insurance proceeds, and it is essential to understand the specific laws and nuances of the state in question.

Life insurance proceeds and separate property

The classification of life insurance proceeds as marital or separate property is a complex issue that depends on various factors, including state laws, the type of life insurance policy, and the timing of premium payments.

In community property states, life insurance proceeds may be considered marital property if the premiums were paid with joint funds during the marriage. In these states, spouses are considered equal owners of all joint assets, including income earned during the marriage and property purchased with that income. However, if the life insurance policy was purchased before marriage and premiums were paid with separate funds, the proceeds would typically be classified as separate property.

In non-community property states, the determination of whether life insurance proceeds are marital or separate property is more nuanced. Courts will consider factors such as ownership of the policy, payment of premiums, and the timing of receipt of proceeds relative to the separation or divorce. For example, in the case of Goodwin v. Goodwin in Pennsylvania, the court found that life insurance proceeds received by one spouse during the marriage were not marital assets, as the policy was owned by the deceased ex-wife, and the premiums were not paid with marital funds.

To further complicate matters, federal laws, such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, may supersede state laws in certain cases, such as with group insurance policies or federal employee plans.

Overall, the classification of life insurance proceeds as marital or separate property is highly dependent on the specific circumstances and applicable state and federal laws. It is essential to consult with a legal professional for guidance on this matter.

Life insurance proceeds and inheritance

In the US, some states are known as "community property states", where all property and income acquired during the marriage is considered jointly owned by both spouses. These states include Washington, California, Arizona, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Wisconsin, and sometimes Alaska and Tennessee. In these states, life insurance proceeds may be considered marital property if they were purchased with community funds. For example, in California, if a life insurance policy is purchased during the marriage with community funds, it is considered community property in a divorce. However, if the proceeds were received as a gift or inheritance, they are typically considered separate property.

In a case in Pennsylvania, a wife received life insurance proceeds from her son's death. The court found that these proceeds were not marital assets because the wife did not own the policy, the proceeds were not from any monetary contribution by the husband, and the proceeds were received before separation.

In another case in North Carolina, a husband received life insurance proceeds from his ex-wife's death. The court found that these proceeds were the husband's separate property because they were considered a gift, and the husband did not own the policy or pay the premiums.

It is important to note that if life insurance proceeds are commingled with marital funds, they may be considered marital property. For example, if the proceeds are used to purchase a house or other assets jointly with a spouse, the court may award a portion of the proceeds to the spouse during a divorce.

To avoid any confusion or conflict, it is recommended that individuals designate beneficiaries wisely and avoid commingling life insurance proceeds with other marital property or joint accounts.

Frequently asked questions