Hospitals' High Insurance Payments: A Necessary Evil?

The cost of healthcare is a significant concern for many people, and the relationship between hospitals and insurers is a critical factor in this. Hospitals' ability to provide care is dependent on their revenue, and insurers are a significant source of funding. However, the dynamic between hospitals and insurers is complex, with hospitals negotiating prices with insurers, and these prices are often higher than those paid by uninsured patients. This has led to concerns about the sustainability of hospitals and the impact of high insurance prices on patients. The variation in prices between different insurers and hospitals has prompted policymakers to consider approaches to reduce what commercial insurers pay, with the aim of lowering premiums for patients.

Private insurers' payment rates are determined through negotiations with providers

The costs of operating a hospital are not fixed and can fluctuate depending on various factors, such as available revenues. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals faced new costs associated with the infrastructure and resources needed to treat patients. This may have led to transitional funding increases from private insurers.

Private insurers' payment rates are typically higher than Medicare rates for hospital and physician services. This difference in payment rates may be due to the negotiating power of hospitals and physicians, who can argue that Medicare rates are too low to cover the reasonable cost of care. By raising prices for private payers, providers can make up for any shortfalls in Medicare reimbursement.

To negotiate better reimbursement rates, providers can analyze their fees and health plans' reimbursement rates to identify and address payment inequities. They can also set target reimbursement rates, such as a percentage of Medicare rates, and use data and a well-reasoned approach to support their negotiations. However, insurers may not be willing to grant large increases, and providers should be prepared to walk away from negotiations if necessary.

Hospitals charge more to insured than uninsured for the same services

Hospitals charging more to the insured than the uninsured for the same services is a phenomenon that has been observed in the United States. This is despite the fact that self-pay uninsured consumers bear the full cost of hospital services, and many end up with medical debt.

A study by Gerardo Ruiz Sánchez, an assistant professor of economics at Trinity College, found evidence that two patients undergoing the same procedure at a hospital are often charged different amounts depending on whether they are paying in cash or are covered by health insurance. The study, which examined data from about 2,200 hospitals, found that 60% of the time, the rates negotiated by health insurance companies were higher than the cash rate for the services. This raises questions about whether insurers are effectively representing consumers in their negotiations with hospitals.

Ruiz Sánchez's research also revealed substantial differences in cash prices across hospitals. The variation in prices charged by hospitals has triggered lawsuits by consumers and some government efforts to level prices. For example, in Maryland, where hospital charges are set by a state regulatory commission, the price markup is the lowest in the country.

The gap between the amount self-pay patients are charged and what Medicare pays for hospital services has also been widening over the years, making it increasingly difficult for the uninsured to pay their medical bills. This has led to suggestions that providing health insurance for the uninsured could reduce the hospital markup for self-pay patients. Other proposed solutions to address the issue include charging a single, flat rate to all hospital patients or establishing a maximum rate through voluntary means or government intervention.

Insurers with dominant market positions negotiate contracts based on diagnoses

Healthcare organizations depend on insurance reimbursements for financial stability. Insurers with a dominant market position have the power to negotiate contracts with healthcare providers based on diagnoses and other factors.

When negotiating insurance contracts, it is essential to understand the insurance company's perspective, goals, and market conditions. For example, insurers are interested in how providers can add value to their portfolio and enhance their competitive position in the healthcare industry. Healthcare providers should also be aware of their own worth and the value they bring to the insurer's network. This includes gathering data on their organization's performance, the cost of services, and market rates to support their arguments for higher reimbursement rates.

Insurers with a dominant market position may have more negotiating power, especially in areas with few other healthcare providers. In such cases, insurance companies may be willing to offer more favorable contract terms to gain a foothold in the region. Additionally, healthcare providers with unique medical services or delivery models that produce better outcomes can leverage this to improve their negotiating position.

To negotiate successfully, healthcare providers should build strong relationships with insurance payers, stay informed about industry trends and regulatory changes, and seek professional assistance if needed. Beginning the negotiation process early and being persistent can also improve the chances of achieving mutually beneficial contract terms.

While negotiating insurance contracts can be challenging, taking the time to engage in discussions and emphasize the value and outcomes of one's practice can lead to more favorable long-term results.

Medicare payment rates are too low to cover the reasonable cost of care

Hospitals have been shown to charge more to insured patients than uninsured patients for the same services. This is due to hospitals negotiating rates with insurance companies, which are often higher than the self-pay cash price.

Medicare payment rates are determined through a rate-setting process that aims to cover the costs that "reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing high-quality care". This base rate is then adjusted based on patient clinical severity, geographic market differences, and other factors such as beneficiaries' access to care, quality of care, and providers' access to capital.

However, some providers argue that Medicare payment rates are too low to cover the reasonable cost of care. The American Hospital Association (AHA) has long claimed that Medicare payment rates reimburse below the cost of care for many services. A 2019 AHA survey found that Medicare reimbursement was $53.9 billion lower than actual costs, with two-thirds of hospitals receiving payments from Medicare that were less than the cost. This has led to concerns that providers are incentivized to use the most expensive treatments available to maximize their profits.

In response, some have proposed setting hospital payments above current Medicare rates to ensure providers do not lose money on Medicare patients. Additionally, Medicare has adopted specific payment systems for different types of healthcare providers, encouraging providers to become more financially efficient.

Hospitals' operating costs are not fixed and fluctuate with available revenues

The costs of operating a hospital are not fixed and can vary based on several factors, including available revenues. Hospitals with high shares of commercial patients tend to have higher operating margins, while those with a high proportion of Medicaid patients have lower margins. For instance, in 2023, hospitals with a high share of Medicaid patients had an operating margin of 2.3%, while those with a low share of such patients had a margin of 7.0%.

The size of the hospital also plays a role, with larger hospitals incurring higher expenses. The average total expenses for hospitals with 25 or fewer beds are $36.8 million, while hospitals with over 250 beds have expenses of $989.8 million. The number of beds is not the only factor influencing operating costs, as location also has an impact. Hospitals in the Northeast and West of the US have the highest average operating expenses, at $391.2 million and $277.9 million, respectively. The high cost of living in large cities in these regions contributes to the higher costs.

The revenue generated by hospitals can also vary based on their patient mix and payment rates from insurers. Private insurers generally reimburse at higher rates than Medicare and Medicaid, although this may not always be the case in rural areas. Hospitals with a higher proportion of private insurance patients may have higher revenues, while those treating a larger number of Medicare or Medicaid patients may face financial strain due to lower payment rates.

The COVID-19 pandemic also impacted hospital revenues and costs. Supplemental funds from the government during the pandemic resulted in increased revenue for some hospitals, such as the Cleveland Clinic, which saw a 17% increase in revenue in 2020 compared to the previous year. Additionally, hospitals incurred new costs associated with treating COVID-19 patients, including infrastructure and resource requirements.

The fluctuation in hospital revenues and the variable nature of operating costs highlight the dynamic financial landscape faced by healthcare providers. Hospitals must adapt to changing market conditions, reimbursement rates, and patient demographics to maintain financial stability and ensure the continued delivery of patient care.

Frequently asked questions