Stark Law And Private Insurance: What's The Verdict?

The Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) are important issues in healthcare, with harsh penalties for violations. The Stark Law is a set of laws that regulate referrals by physicians, making it illegal for physicians to self-refer. The AKS, on the other hand, prohibits the exchange of remuneration for patient referrals. While the AKS applies to any federal healthcare program, the Stark Law only applies to government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and not to private insurance. However, it's worth noting that there are state-level variations, and some states have laws similar to the Stark Law that may apply to private insurance.

Stark Law only applies to government programs

The Stark Law is a set of laws that regulate referrals by physicians. It is named after former Congressman Pete Stark, who was the original sponsor. The law makes it illegal for physicians to refer patients to entities in which they have a financial interest. The basic idea is to keep medical referrals a medical decision, rather than a business decision.

The Stark Law only applies to government programs and does not apply to private insurance. This means that physicians who are not offering services covered by government programs such as Medicare or Medicaid do not need to worry about the Stark Law. The law is federal and applies to government programs like TRICARE, the military's health service.

While the Stark Law does not apply to private insurance, there are two states that have enacted similar laws that apply to private insurance, as it is mostly regulated at the state level. Additionally, there are other federal healthcare statutes and regulations that apply more broadly to any federal healthcare program, such as the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).

The AKS is a criminal law, and a violation can result in prosecution. It prohibits receiving anything of value for patient referrals, including money, reduced rent, use of equipment, health services, or any other form of compensation. The AKS applies to a wide range of federal healthcare programs, including Veterans Health Care, State Children's Health Programs (CHIP), and the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program.

It is important to note that the Stark Law and AKS have different scopes and requirements, and it is crucial for healthcare professionals to understand the specifics of these laws to ensure compliance and avoid penalties.

Anti-Kickback Statute applies to all federal healthcare programs

The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is a federal criminal law that prohibits offering or accepting kickbacks intended to generate healthcare business. It applies to all federal healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, and other government-funded plans or programs that provide health benefits. This includes:

• The State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
• TRICARE and Tricare for Life
• Indian Health Services
• Federal Health Program for Alaska Natives
• Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan
• Federal Employees' Compensation ("FECA")
• The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act ("LHWCA")
• The Federal Black Lung Benefits Act ("FBLBA")
• The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act ("EEOIC")
• Refugee Medical Assistance (RMA)
• Federal Reimbursement of Emergency Health Services to Undocumented Aliens
• Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program

Violations of the AKS are considered a felony and carry serious penalties, including fines of up to $100,000 per violation and up to ten years in jail. It is important to note that the AKS has some exceptions, referred to as "safe harbors," which protect certain payment and business practices from criminal and civil prosecution.

Stark Law is strict liability, AKS requires proof of knowing and willful action

The Physician Self-Referral Law, commonly referred to as the Stark Law, is a strict liability statute, meaning that proof of specific intent to violate the law is not required. The Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring patients to receive "designated health services" payable by Medicare or Medicaid from entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies. Financial relationships include both ownership/investment interests and compensation arrangements.

On the other hand, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is a criminal law that requires proof of "knowing and willful" action. The AKS prohibits the payment of "remuneration" to induce or reward patient referrals or the generation of business involving any item or service payable by federal healthcare programs. Remuneration includes anything of value and can take the form of cash, gifts, free rent, expensive hotel stays, meals, or excessive compensation for medical directorships or consultancies.

The distinction between the Stark Law and the AKS in terms of strict liability and proof of "knowing and willful" action is crucial. The Stark Law imposes liability simply because of the relationship between the parties or the existence of a regulatory violation, regardless of intent. In contrast, the AKS requires proof that the violation was committed knowingly and willfully, making it an intent-based criminal law.

While the Stark Law applies specifically to Medicare and Medicaid, the AKS has a broader scope and covers all federal healthcare programs, including Veterans Health Care, State Children's Health Programs (CHIP), and the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program. As a result, physicians who do not offer services covered by government programs such as Medicare or Medicaid may still be subject to the AKS if they participate in other federal healthcare programs.

Stark Law and AKS have multiple exceptions

The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and Stark Law have multiple exceptions, known as safe harbors. These exceptions are designed to provide flexibility for healthcare providers transitioning to value-based care models.

The AKS prohibits offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce or reward the referral of business reimbursable under any federal healthcare program. On the other hand, the Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring patients for certain "designated health services" payable by Medicare to an entity with which they have a financial relationship.

AKS Safe Harbors

• Care Coordination Arrangements to Improve Quality, Health Outcomes, and Efficiency: This safe harbor protects in-kind remuneration between a Value-Based Enterprise (VBE) and any VBE participant as part of a Value-Based Arrangement (VBA), regardless of whether there is any downside risk involved.
• VBAs with Substantial Downside Financial Risk: This safe harbor protects monetary or in-kind remuneration between a VBE and a VBE participant if the VBE participant "meaningfully shares" in substantial downside risk.
• VBAs with Full Financial Risk: This safe harbor covers monetary or in-kind remuneration between a VBE and a VBE participant if the VBE assumes full financial risk for all payor-covered items and services for the target patient population within six months of the VBA's commencement.

Stark Law Exceptions

• Remuneration Paid Under a VBA: This exception protects remuneration paid under a VBA, regardless of whether there is any downside risk involved.
• VBAs with Meaningful Downside Financial Risk: This exception applies when a physician will be at "meaningful downside financial risk" for failing to achieve the VBA's purposes, meaning they will have to repay or forgo at least 10% of the remuneration received.
• VBAs with Full Financial Risk: This exception is triggered when the VBE assumes full financial risk for the total cost of care for the target patient population within a year of the VBA's commencement.

It's important to note that these exceptions and safe harbors have specific requirements that must be met to ensure compliance with the final rules and regulations.

Similar anti-self-referral laws may exist at the state level

The Stark Law is a federal law and does not apply to private insurance. However, it is possible that similar anti-self-referral laws may exist at the state level. Indeed, two states have laws that apply to private insurance. While the specifics of these state-level laws are unclear, they may be similar to the Stark Law, which prohibits physicians from referring patients to entities in which they have a financial interest.

The existence of anti-self-referral laws at the state level underscores the importance of maintaining ethical practices in the healthcare industry. These laws are designed to protect patients and ensure that medical referrals are based on medical necessity rather than financial incentives. By prohibiting self-referrals, these laws aim to prevent conflicts of interest and potential abuse of the healthcare system.

It is worth noting that the Stark Law is not the only federal legislation addressing self-referrals. The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is another important piece of legislation that aims to prevent kickbacks and bribery in the healthcare industry. The AKS is a criminal statute, and violations can result in significant penalties, including fines, jail time, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs.

While the Stark Law and AKS are both crucial in maintaining the integrity of the healthcare system, they have some key differences. The Stark Law is considered a civil law, and violations result in non-criminal charges. Additionally, the Stark Law specifically applies to referrals by physicians, while the AKS has a broader scope and applies to any referral source, not just physicians.

In conclusion, while the Stark Law does not apply to private insurance, similar anti-self-referral laws may exist at the state level. These laws are essential in maintaining ethical practices and protecting patients from potential abuse and corruption in the healthcare industry. Healthcare professionals must stay informed about both federal and state-level regulations to ensure compliance and uphold the integrity of their profession.

Frequently asked questions