The Worst Auto Insurance Companies: A Comprehensive Guide

With thousands of auto insurance companies in the United States, it's hard to say which is the worst. However, you can look at companies that struggle in certain areas, such as customer service, pricing, and customer loyalty.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and Better Business Bureau (BBB) are great resources for determining how an insurance company performs with customer service. The national average for the NAIC is a rate of 1.0, and anything higher is above average. A company with a lower score means it receives fewer complaints. The BBB assigns a score to car insurance companies based on the number of complaints filed against them and how many get resolved.

When it comes to pricing, insurance companies look at several factors when determining how much to charge, including age, location, gender, car make and model, driver history, and yearly mileage.

In addition to customer service and pricing, you should also consider discounts, how much you drive, if you use your car for work, and if you're a high-risk driver when looking for insurance.

Allstate's poor customer service and high rates

Allstate is one of the worst car insurance companies in America, according to customer reviews and auto insurance ratings. Many customers complain about the company's high rates and difficulties in getting coverage for their claims. Its customer service has also received poor feedback, with reviews stating that it is challenging to reach a live person on the phone and that agents are not knowledgeable about available products and discounts.

In one instance, a customer inquired about Allstate's teen driver discount, to which the agent responded by asking the caller's age instead of providing clear information. When asked about multiple discounts, the agent hesitated and asked for more information rather than answering the question directly. This experience reflects a pattern of unhelpful and evasive interactions with Allstate's customer service representatives.

Another common issue raised by Allstate customers is the company's handling of claims. There are reports of long delays in processing claims, lack of communication, and lowball offers that do not adequately cover the cost of repairs or losses. Some customers have also accused Allstate of denying valid claims or using unfair tactics to minimise payouts.

Allstate's poor performance in customer satisfaction surveys and its reputation for high rates and challenging claims processes reinforce its position as one of the worst auto insurance companies in the United States.

AIG's poor communication and inconsistent policies

AIG's poor communication extends beyond its phone system. Customers have reported that agents often seem unaware of the company's policies and are unable to provide clear or consistent answers to questions. This lack of knowledge and inconsistency in responses can make it challenging for customers to understand their coverage and feel confident in AIG's ability to handle their claims.

In addition to communication issues, AIG has also been criticised for its high rates and challenging claims process. Customers have reported difficulty in obtaining coverage for their claims, which can be a frustrating and time-consuming experience. The combination of poor communication, inconsistent policies, and challenging claims processes has led to AIG being ranked as one of the worst auto insurance companies in America by some reviewers.

To address these issues, AIG should focus on improving internal communication and ensuring that all agents are well-informed about the company's policies and procedures. Simplifying the phone system and providing clearer guidance to callers could also help reduce customer confusion and frustration. By taking these steps, AIG can work towards improving customer satisfaction and providing a more positive and efficient service.

State Farm's confusing contracts and poor-quality repair parts

State Farm is a popular auto insurance company with a large customer base. However, the company has come under scrutiny for its confusing contracts and the use of poor-quality repair parts, which has led to customer dissatisfaction and legal issues.

State Farm offers a Select Service program, which is a network of auto body shops that have agreements with the company to provide repairs to its customers. While this program can offer convenience and a quick claims process, there have been concerns about the quality of repairs and the use of non-original equipment manufacturer (non-OEM) parts.

State Farm has been accused of using non-OEM parts, also known as aftermarket parts, which are often cheaper and not directly sourced from the vehicle's manufacturer. In 1999, a class-action lawsuit, Snider vs. State Farm, found that the company had deceived policyholders by specifying the use of non-OEM parts for collision repairs, resulting in a $1.19 billion settlement. Despite this, State Farm has continued to defend the use of non-OEM parts, citing cost savings and supply chain issues.

The issue with non-OEM parts is not just about cost but also quality and safety. There have been concerns that these parts may not meet the same standards as OEM parts in terms of fit, performance, and corrosion resistance. In some cases, subpar technicians working with these parts may rush repairs, leading to further issues. State Farm does offer a satisfaction guarantee for the parts it uses, but this may not always be enough to reassure customers.

State Farm's contracts and policies can also be confusing for customers. The company's website outlines various parts and repair options, including non-OEM, recycled, and OEM surplus parts. However, the fine print and exclusions in their policies can be difficult to navigate, leading to frustration and disputes over coverage.

In conclusion, while State Farm offers convenience and a wide network of repair shops, their use of non-OEM parts and confusing contracts has led to dissatisfaction among customers and legal troubles. It is important for consumers to be aware of their rights and options when it comes to auto insurance and repairs, as the quality of repairs can have a significant impact on their safety and vehicle performance.

Liberty Mutual's non-renewal of policies in hurricane-prone areas

Liberty Mutual is one of the worst auto insurance companies in the US, according to Consumer Reports and J.D. Power's 2022 U.S. Auto-Insurance Study.

In 2024, Liberty Mutual's subsidiary non-renewed 17,000 fire policies in California, citing technology-related factors. The decision, which took place from September to November, was attributed to the company's intention to retire outdated technology used to manage these policies. This move left thousands of homeowners scrambling for alternative coverage and potentially impacted their financial security and property safety.

Liberty Mutual has also been criticised for its non-renewal of policies in hurricane-prone areas. While the company provides resources to help customers prepare for and recover from hurricanes, there are concerns about its commitment to providing coverage in these high-risk regions.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Florence, Liberty Mutual and its subsidiary Safeco Insurance mobilised more than 200 claims experts and adjusters to the affected region to handle personal insurance claims. The companies set up two home and auto claims mobile units and encouraged customers to report their claims 24 hours a day.

Liberty Mutual's actions in hurricane-prone areas highlight the challenges of obtaining insurance coverage in regions vulnerable to natural disasters. While the company provides resources and assistance during hurricanes, its non-renewal of policies in these areas can leave homeowners struggling to find alternative coverage, impacting their financial security and property protection.

GEICO's low customer satisfaction

GEICO is one of the largest car insurance companies in the United States, offering low rates, great customer service, and exceptional financial strength. However, GEICO has received low customer satisfaction ratings from J.D. Power, a marketing research company that surveys customer satisfaction and product quality.

In J.D. Power's 2022 U.S. Auto-Insurance Study, GEICO received the lowest rating for satisfaction, scoring 853 points out of a possible 1000. This rating was based on five factors: the billing process, policy information, interaction, policy offerings, price, and claims. GEICO's low customer satisfaction rating may be due to a variety of factors, including issues with the billing process, policy offerings, or claims handling.

Additionally, GEICO scored below average in seven out of eleven regions in J.D. Power's 2024 US Auto Insurance Study, which polls customers on price, ease of doing business, product offerings, problem resolution, and other categories. GEICO also ranked below average in J.D. Power's surveys on the claims process, insurance shopping, and the digital experience.

However, it's important to note that GEICO has far fewer complaints than other major car insurance companies. According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, GEICO has close to 40% fewer complaints than other insurers of its size. GEICO also received a high rating from the Better Business Bureau, which evaluates companies based on transparency, truthful advertising, and responsiveness to consumer complaints.

While GEICO offers low rates and is available nationwide, its low customer satisfaction ratings may be a concern for potential customers. It's always a good idea to research and compare multiple insurance providers before making a decision.

Frequently asked questions