Understanding Negligence: The Key To Unlocking Insurance Claims

In insurance, negligence refers to the failure to take reasonable action to prevent damage or harm to a person or property. This can be the result of an action or a failure to act, but it is never intentional. Negligence is typically tied to liability insurance, such as home, life, health, business, and auto insurance. For example, if a retail shop owner leaves their hose out after cleaning the sidewalk, causing a passerby to trip, their general liability coverage would respond. Similarly, if a digital marketing consultant offers careless advice to a client, causing a decline in the client's revenue, their professional liability insurance would respond if the consultant is held liable for negligence. It's important to note that negligence doesn't automatically create grounds for a lawsuit; instead, individuals can be sued for the property damages or bodily injury damages resulting from a negligent act.

Negligence is the failure to take reasonable action to prevent harm or damage

Negligence is a legal theory that must be proven before an individual can be held legally responsible for harm caused to another person. Negligence is the failure to take reasonable action to prevent harm or damage. This includes harm caused to a person or their property.

Negligence can be the result of an action or a failure to act. For example, a driver who collides with a pedestrian may be found negligent when they exercise a level of care that is less than that of the typical careful driver in the same circumstances.

In insurance terms, negligence is tied to various types of liability insurance, such as home, life, health, business, and auto. For instance, a retail shop owner who leaves their water hose out after cleaning the sidewalk, causing a passerby to trip, would be considered negligent. In this case, the store owner's general liability coverage would respond.

Negligence claims require proof of the following four things:

• Duty: The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff under the circumstances.
• Breach: The defendant breached that legal duty by acting or failing to act in a certain way.
• Causation: The defendant's actions or inaction caused the plaintiff's injury.
• Damages: The plaintiff was harmed or injured as a result of the defendant's actions, resulting in damages.

It's important to note that negligence is never intentional. If an individual hurts someone or causes damage on purpose, it is not considered negligence.

Negligence can be an action or an omission

In insurance, negligence is the failure to take reasonable action to prevent damage or harm to a person or property. Negligence can be an action or an omission, and it is never intentional. If harm is caused on purpose, it does not fall under negligence.

Negligence is a tort involving the failure to use a degree of care that would be expected of a reasonable person in a given situation. The omission of actions is considered negligent when a person had a duty to act. For example, if a person's previous conduct established a duty to help someone, and they fail to do so, that is negligence.

In the context of insurance, negligence can refer to the policyholder, others covered under the policy, or a third party. For instance, if a policyholder fails to lock their house and someone enters and steals their TV, the insurance company will likely not cover the full costs of the mistake.

Negligence can also apply to businesses. For example, if a business owner fails to shovel snow from the sidewalk and a neighbour slips and falls, they could be found negligent.

In professional contexts, negligence means a failure to carry out the duty of care owed to a client, which results in financial loss. For instance, if a management consultant gives bad advice that results in financial loss for a client, they could be found negligent.

To prove negligence, several elements must typically be established: the existence of a legal duty that the defendant owed the plaintiff, the defendant's breach of that duty, harm to the plaintiff, and the defendant's actions as the proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff.

Gross negligence is a more serious form of negligence

Gross negligence is typically not covered by general liability policies. In the event of gross negligence, the insurer can reclaim a portion of the costs incurred from the insured. The portion can amount to 20%, 50% or more, depending on the level of gross negligence.

Examples of gross negligence include:

• Driving through a red light or overlooking a stop sign
• Texting on a mobile phone while driving
• Eating while driving
• Leaving a dog with a history of biting off its leash, and it bites a neighbour
• Ignoring a gas leak in your yard, which then ignites and causes damage to a neighbour's property
• Failing to stop completely at a stop sign and hitting another car
• Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs or medication

Contributory negligence reduces the plaintiff's compensation

Contributory negligence is a legal defence that is used in some personal injury cases. It is a common-law tort rule that bars plaintiffs from recovering damages if they have contributed to their injury through their own negligence. In other words, if the injured party was negligent in any way, they are not eligible to receive damages. This is an 'all-or-nothing' scenario, where the injured party cannot recover any compensation if they are found to be even 1% responsible for their injury.

The doctrine of contributory negligence has been criticised for being too harsh and leading to inequitable outcomes. As such, many jurisdictions have replaced it with the doctrine of comparative negligence. Under comparative negligence, a negligent plaintiff can still recover compensation from a negligent defendant, but their compensation is reduced based on their percentage of fault.

For example, let's say a construction worker who smoked 10 packs of cigarettes a day for 20 years develops lung cancer due to long-term exposure to asbestos at work. The worker's family sues the employer for not employing proper safety measures, but the defendant argues that the worker's smoking habit contributed to their cancer. The court may then reduce the amount payable by the defendant based on the plaintiff's negligence in protecting themselves from lung cancer.

In the context of insurance, negligence refers to the failure to act in a way that a reasonable person would when faced with the same situation. This can include failing to take reasonable action to prevent damage or harm to a person or property. Negligence can be used as a defence by defendants to reduce their financial responsibility in insurance claims.

In summary, contributory negligence reduces the plaintiff's compensation by barring their recovery or reducing the amount of compensation they receive if their actions increased the likelihood of the incident occurring.

Negligence can lead to legal liability

Negligence is the failure to exercise a reasonable level of care in doing something. It is a foundational concept of tort law and can lead to legal liability.

The Four Elements of Negligence

There are four elements to proving negligence:

• Duty: The defendant owed a legal duty of care to the plaintiff under the circumstances. For example, a doctor owes a patient a legal duty to provide competent medical care.
• Breach: The defendant breached that legal duty by acting or failing to act in a certain way. For instance, a driver who speeds, drives drunk, or fails to yield to pedestrians has breached their duty of care.
• Causation: The defendant's breach of duty was the actual cause of the plaintiff's injury. In other words, the plaintiff must show that "but for" the defendant's actions, their injury would not have occurred.
• Damages: The plaintiff suffered harm or injury as a result of the defendant's actions, resulting in damages. This could include bodily harm, harm to property, or emotional distress.

Comparative vs. Contributory Negligence

It's important to note that negligence does not always result in legal liability. The concept of negligence is used to determine fault and assign blame, which then informs the amount of compensation or damages awarded.

There are two main types of negligence used to determine fault:

• Comparative Negligence: This assigns blame in proportion to each party's level of involvement in causing the incident. Most US states have adopted comparative negligence, where the plaintiff can still collect some damages based on the percentage they are at fault.
• Contributory Negligence: This states that if the injured party (plaintiff) was negligent at all, they are not eligible to receive damages. In other words, it's an all-or-nothing scenario.

Gross Negligence

Gross negligence refers to acts of negligence that display an extreme disregard for the safety of others. It involves a willful or deliberate disregard for the safety of others, which can result in serious injuries. General liability insurance policies typically do not cover gross negligence.

Frequently asked questions