Autopsy's Impact On Life Insurance: What You Need To Know

Life insurance provides financial protection for your loved ones when you die. However, policies don't pay out in every situation. While pre-death medical evaluations may be required, life insurance policies generally do not require an autopsy when the policyholder dies unless there are suspicions of foul play or unclear circumstances surrounding the death. In such cases, an autopsy may be necessary to ensure legal and procedural clarity. The decision to perform an autopsy is based on legal requirements rather than insurance status. The policyholder and their family may object to an autopsy, but a medical examiner, government official, attorney, or insurance company can overrule their decision under certain conditions.

Autopsy requirements are independent of insurance policies

Life insurance companies exist to make profits, and they do so by collecting the maximum amount of premiums while denying the maximum number of claims. They will go to great lengths to find reasons to deny legitimate claims. For example, if the insured dies during the period of contestability (usually the first two years after the policy is issued), the insurer has the right to determine if the person was under the influence of drugs when they died and whether they can invoke the drug exclusion.

In most cases, life insurance policies cover deaths from natural causes and accidents. Suicide is also covered, but only after a certain amount of time has passed since the policy was bought. If the policyholder dies due to a risky hobby or dangerous occupation, the insurer may not pay benefits, depending on the policy's details. "Slayer rules" prevent a death benefit payout to the beneficiary if they are found to have murdered the policyholder or are closely tied to their murder.

It's important to note that the decision to perform an autopsy is based on legal requirements rather than insurance status. The deceased and their family have autopsy rights, which allow them to determine whether an autopsy should be performed and to what extent. However, there are exceptions to these rights, such as when there is suspicion of foul play or if the cause of death is unclear. In such cases, an autopsy may be performed over the objections of the family to ensure legal clarity.

Autopsy rights are given to the deceased and next of kin

Autopsy rights are given to the deceased and the next of kin to determine whether and to what extent autopsies should be performed. Typically, the individual (before death) and the next of kin decide whether an autopsy is performed. However, there are exceptions, such as when there is suspicion or uncertainty regarding the circumstances surrounding the death. For instance, if the cause and timing of the death relate to the liability of another party, that party may be able to request an autopsy over the objection of the next of kin. This is particularly the case when murder or medical malpractice is suspected, or when an insurance company wants to check if the cause of death falls within an insurance policy.

In cases where the next of kin or the intentions of the deceased conflict, states differ on whose interests take priority. Generally, the order is the wishes of the deceased, followed by the spouse, and then the other next of kin. Some states may give spouses and next of kin priority over the deceased if the state follows a "property right" theory, where a person loses their property rights over their body upon death.

The next of kin may be able to prevent untimely or improper autopsies, such as when an autopsy is requested after burial or when the autopsy exceeds what was authorized. If an autopsy is performed or incorrectly performed without authorization, the next of kin may have a cause of action against the individuals responsible for the autopsy. Many states extend tortious interference to autopsies that exceed the scope of authorization, such as when organs or other body parts are unnecessarily removed and not returned.

In the context of life insurance, an autopsy may be relevant in determining whether a claim should be paid out. While an autopsy is not required for life insurance, insurance companies may request one to investigate the circumstances of the death, especially if it occurs within the first two years of the policy being issued. This is known as the ""period of contestability", during which the insurance company can investigate the circumstances of the policyholder's death. If the insured dies during this period due to a drug overdose, the insurer may invoke the drug exclusion and withhold the death benefit if it can be proven that the overdose was intentional.

Autopsy reports can be used to deny legitimate claims

Life insurance companies exist to make profits and answer to shareholders. The best way for them to keep shareholders happy is to collect the maximum amount of premiums while denying the maximum number of claims. Knowing this to be a winning business model, life insurers go to great lengths to come up with reasons to deny legitimate claims.

Autopsy reports play a significant role in this process. While life insurance policies do not require an autopsy at the time of death, insurance companies will request one if there is suspicion of foul play, or if an issue requires further investigation. This is to ensure legal and procedural clarity. In cases where the insured dies during the period of contestability, the insurer has the right to determine if the person was under the influence of drugs when they died and whether the company can invoke the drug exclusion. A toxicology report will give them this information.

However, after the period of contestability ends, the drug exclusion should no longer be in effect. If an insurance company is delaying or denying a claim made more than two years after the policy was issued while waiting for a toxicology report, they are likely engaging in the wrongful delay or denial of the claim. In such cases, the beneficiary may have a cause of action against the individuals responsible for the autopsy.

Autopsies may be required if foul play is suspected

Life insurance companies exist to make profits for their shareholders. They do this by collecting the maximum amount of premiums while denying the maximum number of claims. To deny claims, insurance companies will go to great lengths to come up with reasons for denying legitimate claims.

In the case of a death, the insurance company will require the beneficiary to submit a certified copy of the policyholder's death certificate along with the claim form. This is to ensure that the policyholder has actually died. In addition, if the policyholder dies within the first two years after the policy is issued, the insurance company typically has the right to undertake a full investigation into the circumstances of the policyholder's death. This is known as the "period of contestability". During this time, the insurance company can check for any exclusions in the policy that would allow them to deny the claim. For example, many life insurance policies contain exclusions that relieve the insurance company from paying a claim if the policyholder died during the commission of a crime.

Autopsies are not generally required for life insurance. However, they may be necessary if there are suspicions of foul play, or if the cause of death is unclear and requires further investigation. This is to ensure legal and procedural clarity rather than being a requirement of the insurance policy. If the cause and timing of death relate to the liability of another party, that party may be able to request an autopsy over the objection of the next of kin. This is particularly the case when murder or medical malpractice is suspected.

In the US, autopsy rights are given to the deceased and the next of kin to determine whether and to what extent autopsies should be performed. However, there are exceptions, such as when there is suspicion regarding the circumstances surrounding the death. If an autopsy is performed without authorization, the next of kin may be able to sue the responsible party.

Toxicology reports can determine drug use

In the context of life insurance, a toxicology report is often used to determine whether the insured person was under the influence of drugs when they died. This information can be crucial in deciding whether the insurance company can invoke the "drug exclusion" clause, which relieves the company from paying out a claim if the insured died while under the influence of illegal substances.

Toxicology screening is a process that can identify the type and approximate amount of legal and illegal drugs a person has ingested. It is most commonly performed using blood or urine samples, but in some cases, gastric lavage (stomach pumping) or vomiting may be used to obtain stomach contents for analysis. The test must be conducted within a specific timeframe after drug consumption, as the detectability of drugs in the body varies. For example, a negative value in a blood toxicology screen indicates an absence of alcohol, prescription medicines not prescribed to the individual, and illegal drugs. Conversely, a positive value indicates the presence and level of a substance in the body.

Urine tests are often reported as positive or negative and are typically used in emergency medical situations. In contrast, blood tests can provide more detailed information about the presence and quantity of drugs in the system. It is important to note that both urine and blood tests have limitations and can produce false positives or negatives. For example, a positive drug screen may reflect previous drug use rather than acute intoxication, especially in patients who exhibit tolerance and minimal symptoms.

In the context of life insurance, toxicology reports are typically required if the insured person dies within the first two years of the policy being issued. This period is known as the "period of contestability," during which the insurance company has the right to investigate the circumstances of the death fully. If the toxicology report indicates drug use that would exclude the insurance company from paying the claim, they may deny the beneficiary's claim.

While toxicology reports can be a reason for denying a claim, it is important to note that life insurance companies have a duty to their beneficiaries. If a claim is delayed or denied, beneficiaries can seek legal advice to understand their rights and options.

Frequently asked questions