Mutual Life Insurance: Better Or Just Different?

are mutual life insurance better than others

When it comes to life insurance, there are two main types of companies to choose from: mutual insurers and publicly traded insurers. So, what's the difference, and are mutual insurers better?

A mutual insurance company is owned by its policyholders, who are considered members and have voting rights. The company's profits are returned to these members in the form of dividends or reduced premiums. Mutual insurers are not listed on stock exchanges and are not beholden to shareholders or Wall Street expectations, allowing them to focus on long-term benefits for their members.

On the other hand, publicly traded insurers are owned by shareholders, who may or may not be customers of the company. Their focus tends to be on short-term financial gains and meeting shareholder expectations.

While mutual insurers offer the advantage of a customer-centric approach, they may have limited access to capital, which can affect their growth prospects. Publicly traded insurers, on the other hand, can more easily raise capital by selling shares.

Ultimately, the choice between a mutual or publicly traded insurer depends on individual needs and preferences. It's essential to consider various factors, including the company's ratings, financial strength, and the products and services they offer.

Characteristics Values
Ownership structure Mutual insurers are owned by policyholders, whereas stock insurers are owned by shareholders.
Voting rights Mutual insurers allow policyholders to vote on management and policies. Stock insurers give shareholders voting rights, but policyholders cannot vote.
Investment strategy Mutual insurers focus on long-term benefits for policyholders and are not influenced by short-term profit targets. Stock insurers aim to meet shareholder expectations and short-term financial results.
Capital raising Stock insurers can raise capital by selling shares, while mutual insurers cannot and have limited financial flexibility.
Dividends Mutual insurers distribute profits to policyholders as dividends or reduced premiums. Shareholders of stock insurers receive dividends.
Stability Mutual insurers are stable due to their focus on long-term financial strength and policyholder benefits. Stock insurers may be influenced by shareholder demands and short-term targets.
Demutualization Mutual insurers can become stock companies through demutualization, but this is a lengthy process requiring policyholder approval.

shunins

Mutual insurers are owned by policyholders, who have voting rights and may receive dividends

Mutual insurers are owned by their policyholders, who are often described as sharing ownership of the company. Policyholders are members with voting rights, and they may receive dividends.

Policyholders of a mutual insurance company are often insured under one of the company's individual, participating whole life insurance policies. This means they are members entitled to vote for the Board of Directors. If they also own a participating policy, they may be eligible to share in any dividends that are declared.

A mutual insurance company is run for the benefit of its policyholders, and as such, its investment and business strategies tend to focus on providing long-term value to them. This means that mutual insurers are not beholden to the short-term demands of investors and shareholders. Policyholders are more inclined to want a company strategy that benefits them in the long run.

Mutual insurers make decisions based on the long-term interests of their policyholders. They focus on investment and business strategies that provide long-term value while maintaining high levels of financial strength to meet future financial obligations.

While policyholders have voting rights, they don't always exercise them, and the average policyholder may not know what makes the most sense for the company. Their voting rights are also less influential than those of institutional investors, who can accumulate significant ownership in a company.

Mutual insurers have the disadvantage of not being able to raise capital in the public markets, which can affect their ability to pursue growth objectives such as mergers or acquisitions. They have less financial flexibility and generally retain more capital on their books.

Despite these potential drawbacks, mutual insurers tend to have strong financial strength and creditworthiness ratings. For example, MassMutual, New York Life, and Northwestern Mutual are all mutual insurers with high ratings.

shunins

Stock insurance companies are owned by shareholders and can raise capital by selling shares

When it comes to life insurance, there are two main types of companies: mutual insurance companies and stock insurance companies. The key difference between the two lies in their ownership structure and how they raise capital.

Stock insurance companies, also known as capital stock insurance companies, are owned by shareholders rather than policyholders. This means that the company's objective is to maximise profits for its shareholders. To achieve this, stock insurance companies can raise capital by selling shares in the company, in addition to utilising their surplus and reserve accounts. This provides them with greater flexibility and access to capital, making it easier to fund rapid growth and expansion. However, this focus on short-term financial gains may sometimes conflict with the long-term interests of policyholders.

On the other hand, mutual insurance companies are owned by their policyholders, who are often described as sharing in the ownership of the company and are entitled to vote for the Board of Directors. Any profits made by a mutual insurance company are returned to the policyholders in the form of dividends or reduced future premiums. Mutual insurance companies, therefore, have a customer-centric focus, prioritising the long-term interests of their policyholders. However, they are limited in their ability to raise capital, as they cannot sell shares in the company and must rely on other methods such as issuing debt or borrowing from policyholders.

In summary, while stock insurance companies have greater access to capital through the sale of shares, mutual insurance companies offer a more customer-centric model by prioritising the long-term interests of their policyholder-owners. When deciding between the two, it is essential to consider factors such as the company's ratings, financial performance, customer service, and cost to determine which type of insurance company aligns better with your financial needs and goals.

shunins

Mutual insurers are not beholden to short-term shareholder targets

Unlike publicly traded insurers, mutual insurers are not beholden to short-term shareholder targets. This means that mutual insurers are not influenced by the pressure of having to reach short-term profit targets and can operate in a way that benefits their members and policyholders in the long term.

Rob Haines, a senior analyst at CreditSight, a New York-based independent provider of credit research, states that:

> [m]utual insurers are run for the benefit of the policyholders on a long-term basis.

As mutual insurers are not publicly traded, they do not face the same pressure from shareholders as publicly traded insurers. This allows them to focus on the long-term interests of their policyholders, who are often also the owners of the company.

J. Todd Gentry, a financial professional with Synergy Wealth Solutions, notes that:

> [m]utual life insurers make decisions based on the long-term interests of their policyowners.

This customer-centric approach is further emphasised by Erika Rasure, a leading consumer economics subject matter expert, who states that:

> [m]any people feel mutual insurers are a better choice since the company’s priority is to serve the policyholders who own the company.

The focus on long-term benefits for policyholders can also be seen in the investment strategies of mutual insurers. As they are not listed on stock exchanges, mutual insurers can invest in safer, low-yield assets, without the pressure to reach short-term profit targets.

However, it is important to note that the lack of influence from shareholders can also be a disadvantage for mutual insurers. As the investment strategies of these companies are not influenced by shareholders, it can be more difficult for policyholders to determine the financial solvency of a mutual insurance company or how it calculates the dividends sent to its members.

Life Insurance: DSHS Resource or Not?

You may want to see also

shunins

Mutual insurers cannot raise capital by selling shares

Mutual insurance companies are owned by policyholders, who are also the company's customers. This means that mutual insurers cannot raise capital by selling shares, as they do not have shareholders. Instead, mutual insurers raise capital by issuing debt or borrowing from policyholders. This debt must be repaid from operating profits, which are also needed for future growth, maintaining a reserve against future liabilities, and other needs.

This inability to raise capital by selling shares is a significant disadvantage for mutual insurers. It can hamper their growth, especially when it comes to mergers and acquisitions. In contrast, stock insurance companies can access capital more easily by selling additional shares. This gives them more flexibility and greater access to capital, allowing them to achieve more rapid growth by expanding their domestic and international markets.

However, mutual insurers' focus on long-term value for policyholders can lead to more conservative investment strategies and larger surpluses. Mutual insurers tend to collect more capital on their balance sheets, retaining more capital to maintain their financial strength and meet future obligations to policyholders. This reduces their need to access debt markets, but they may occasionally issue surplus notes for capital needs.

While mutual insurers cannot sell shares to raise capital, their structure ensures that the interests of the company's owners and customers are aligned, with a focus on long-term value and stability.

shunins

Mutual insurers tend to focus on long-term investment strategies

Mutual insurers are owned by their policyholders, and their sole purpose is to provide insurance coverage for their members at or near cost. As such, mutual insurers tend to focus on long-term investment strategies that benefit their policyholders.

Because they are not beholden to shareholders or Wall Street expectations, mutual insurers are not pressured to meet short-term profit targets. Instead, they can operate with the goal of maximising long-term benefits for their members. This means that mutual insurers tend to invest in safer, low-yield assets.

While this investment strategy may make it more difficult for policyholders to determine the financial solvency of a mutual insurance company, it ensures that the company is run for the benefit of the policyholders. This focus on long-term investment strategies also means that mutual insurers are not subject to takeover efforts or offers by private equity firms and other investment outfits.

In contrast, stock insurance companies are owned by shareholders who are investors, not necessarily customers of the company. As a result, stock insurance companies tend to focus on immediate, short-term financial results and investment and performance that will support their stock price.

Frequently asked questions

A mutual insurance company is owned by its policyholders, who are given the right to select the management.

Mutual insurance companies make investments in portfolios like regular mutual funds, and any profits are returned to members as dividends or a reduction in premiums.

Mutual insurance companies are run for the benefit of policyholders and are not beholden to shareholders or Wall Street expectations. They focus on long-term benefits and investment strategies that provide value to policyowners.

Mutual insurance companies have limited access to capital and may struggle to pursue growth objectives such as large mergers or acquisitions. They also have less financial flexibility compared to stock insurance companies.

When choosing between a mutual and stock insurance company, consider the company's ratings, surplus, premium persistency, and whether their products meet your financial needs and provide good customer service.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment