Risk-Based Capital: Selling Life Insurance With Confidence

Risk-based capital (RBC) is a regulatory standard that establishes a minimum level of capital that insurance companies must hold. This level is based on the company's size and the riskiness of its financial assets and operations. RBC is designed to identify weakly capitalized companies and facilitate regulatory action to ensure policyholders receive the benefits promised.

RBC requirements are determined by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and are based on five categories of risk: insurance affiliates, asset risk, insurance/underwriting risk, interest rate risk, and business risk.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is responsible for setting RBC requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities. These requirements are set to prevent the economic and consumer impacts resulting from the failure of organizations engaged in banking and insurance.

What is risk-based capital?

Risk-based capital (RBC) is a regulatory requirement for financial institutions, including insurance companies, that establishes a minimum level of capital that must be maintained. This requirement is based on two main factors: the size of the company and the level of risk associated with its financial assets and operations. In other words, the company must hold capital in proportion to its risk.

The purpose of RBC requirements is to identify undercapitalized companies and facilitate regulatory intervention to protect policyholders. It is a critical tool that enables regulators to take control of an insurance company if necessary. The RBC formula is not meant to be used in isolation to determine financial solvency but rather as one of the tools to assess the minimum capital required for an insurer to support its operations.

RBC requirements were introduced in the 1990s after a wave of insurance company insolvencies in the 1980s. Before the RBC standard, fixed capital standards were used, which required all insurance companies to hold the same minimum amount of capital regardless of their size or risk profile. The RBC approach addresses variations in risk and size, ensuring that companies hold sufficient capital to sustain operating losses and maintain a stable market.

There are separate RBC formulas for different lines of business, including life insurance, property/casualty insurance, and health insurance. These formulas consider various types of risk, such as asset risk, underwriting risk, interest rate risk, and business risk. Regulators use these formulas to determine the minimum capital required and take preventive or corrective measures if a company falls below the required capital level.

How does risk-based capital work in the insurance industry?

Risk-based capital requirements (RBC) are rules that establish a minimum level of capital for financial institutions such as banks and insurance companies. The RBC requirement for insurance companies is based on two factors: the size of the company and the inherent riskiness of its financial assets and operations. Regulators use RBC requirements to determine the minimum amount of capital an insurer needs to support its operations and write coverage.

The purpose of RBC requirements is to identify weakly capitalized companies, facilitating regulatory actions to ensure policyholders receive the benefits promised without relying on a guaranty association or taxpayer funds. RBC requirements are not designed to be used as a stand-alone tool in determining financial solvency, but rather as one of the tools that give regulators legal authority to take control of an insurance company.

RBC requirements are based on a company's asset risks, credit risks, underwriting risks, and off-balance-sheet risks. For example, RBC requirements in life insurance are based on five categories of risk: insurance affiliates and miscellaneous risks, asset risk, insurance (underwriting) risk, interest rate risk, and business risk.

The RBC standard for life and property/casualty (P/C) companies is based on the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) For Insurers Model Act (#312), which the NAIC initially adopted in 1993 (latest revision, 2011). The RBC standard for health insurers is the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) for Health Organizations Model Act (#315), which the NAIC initially adopted in 1998 (latest revision, 2009).

The insurance industry began using risk-based capital instead of fixed-capital standards in the 1990s after a string of insurance companies became insolvent in the 1980s and 1990s. Risk-based capital requirements act as a cushion to protect a company from insolvency.

What are the benefits of risk-based capital for life insurance companies?

Risk-based capital requirements (RBC) are essential for protecting life insurance companies and their clients. They ensure that insurance companies have enough capital to sustain operating losses and protect the economy as a whole. RBC requirements are based on the size of the company and the riskiness of its financial assets and operations. This means that companies with higher risks and more assets are required to hold more capital.

The benefits of RBC for life insurance companies include:

• Protection from insolvency: RBC acts as a cushion to protect life insurance companies from insolvency. By requiring companies to hold capital in proportion to their risk, RBC helps ensure that companies have enough funds to cover potential losses.
• Timely regulatory intervention: RBC formulas facilitate regulatory intervention by helping identify weakly capitalized companies. This enables regulators to take control of an insurance company if necessary and ensure that policyholders receive their promised benefits without relying on taxpayer funds or guaranty associations.
• Customization: RBC requirements are tailored to each company's unique level of risk and size, unlike fixed-capital standards, which require all companies to hold the same amount of capital regardless of their financial condition. This customization allows for a more accurate assessment of a company's financial health.
• Flexibility: RBC requirements are subject to a permanent floor, but they also provide flexibility in risk calculation for certain low-risk assets. This flexibility allows companies to better manage their capital requirements.
• Standardization: The RBC system is based on standardized formulas and guidelines, such as the Basel Accords, which help assess a company's credit risk and balance sheet assets. This standardization ensures consistency and comparability across the industry.

What are the drawbacks of risk-based capital for life insurance companies?

Risk-based capital (RBC) requirements are designed to protect life insurance companies and their clients. However, there are some drawbacks to this approach.

Firstly, RBC requirements can be complex and time-consuming to calculate, particularly when applied to life insurance companies. This is because life insurance companies have unique risk profiles that must be carefully assessed and monitored. The calculations involve adding up the main risks these companies commonly face, considering potential dependencies among these risks, and allowing for the benefits of diversification.

Secondly, RBC requirements may not always accurately reflect the true financial health of a life insurance company. While they are designed to identify weakly capitalized companies, they are not intended to be used as a standalone tool for determining financial solvency. As such, a life insurance company may meet the RBC requirements but still face financial challenges that are not adequately addressed.

Thirdly, RBC requirements can be subject to regulatory changes and updates, which can create uncertainty and additional compliance burdens for life insurance companies. Regulators have the legal authority to take control of an insurance company if it fails to meet the RBC requirements, which can be a significant drawback for companies struggling to maintain the required capital levels.

Another drawback is that RBC requirements may not adequately address all the risks faced by life insurance companies. While they consider the size and inherent riskiness of a company's financial assets and operations, they may not capture all the unique risks associated with the life insurance industry, such as longevity risks or changes in interest rates.

Finally, RBC requirements can be inflexible, as they are based on predetermined formulas and standards. This lack of flexibility may hinder a life insurance company's ability to adapt to changing market conditions or pursue certain investment opportunities.

How does risk-based capital work for depository institutions?

Risk-based capital requirements are regulatory rules that establish minimum regulatory capital for financial institutions such as banks. The goal is to keep banks stable, even during financial crises, and prevent bank runs.

In the US, many banks are subject to Federal Regulation H, which details the specifics of the Market Risk Capital Rule (MRR). This regulation sets limits on certain types of investments and requirements on various classes of loans. It also introduces a new method for calculating risk-weighted assets in accordance with MRR, increasing the risk sensitivity of the capital requirements.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is also responsible for adopting risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities. This risk-based capital framework, termed the Building Block Approach, adjusts and aggregates existing legal entity capital requirements to determine enterprise-wide capital requirements.

The Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act imposes minimum risk-based capital requirements for insured depository institutions, depository institutions, holding firms, and non-bank financial companies that are supervised by the Federal Reserve. Under the Dodd-Frank rules, each bank is required to have a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% and a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%.

Risk-based capital requirements are now subject to a permanent floor, as per a rule adopted in June 2011 by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This rule also provides some flexibility in risk calculation for certain low-risk assets.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which operates through the Bank for International Settlements, publishes the Basel Accords. These guidelines are meant to help assess a bank's credit risk related to its balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposure. Basel III was developed in response to deficits in financial regulation that appeared in the late 2000s financial crisis.

The insurance industry also uses risk-based capital requirements, instead of fixed-capital standards, to determine the minimum amount of capital required for an insurer to support its operations and write coverage. The RBC standard for life and property/casualty (P/C) companies is based on the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) For Insurers Model Act, which the NAIC initially adopted in 1993. The RBC standard for health insurers is the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) for Health Organizations Model Act, which the NAIC initially adopted in 1998.

Frequently asked questions