In the US, there is no federal law requiring doctors to carry medical malpractice insurance. However, this insurance is required by law in most states. Nearly 32 states do not require medical malpractice insurance and do not have minimum carrying requirements. The remaining 18 states either require a minimum level of insurance or state that medical professionals must have some insurance to qualify for liability reforms.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Federal Law Requirement | No federal law requires doctors to carry medical malpractice insurance |
State Law Requirement | 32 states do not require doctors to purchase medical malpractice insurance. 7 states require doctors to maintain a minimum level of malpractice insurance. The remaining 11 states require doctors to carry a minimum amount of coverage or have some insurance to be eligible for liability reforms. |
Cost | Medical malpractice insurance is incredibly expensive. Many doctors pay tens of thousands of dollars each year for coverage. |
Risk of Being Sued | Doctors without insurance are less likely to be sued. |
Risk of Bankruptcy | Doctors without insurance are at risk of bankruptcy due to legal costs. |
Risk of Personal Financial Ruin | Doctors without insurance are at risk of personal financial ruin. |
Hospital or Employer Coverage | Hospital or employer coverage may not be enough. |
Coverage Gaps | Employer-provided coverage may have gaps when changing jobs. |
What You'll Learn
Doctors in the US don't need malpractice insurance in 32 states
In the United States, there is no federal law requiring doctors to carry medical malpractice insurance. However, some states do mandate it. Whether doctors are required to have insurance depends on the state in which they practice.
Roughly 32 states, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, and Hawaii, do not require medical malpractice insurance and have no minimum carrying requirements. This means that doctors in these states can choose to practice without insurance, often referred to as "going bare."
However, it is important to note that even in these states, doctors may still be required to obtain malpractice insurance in certain situations. Many hospitals mandate that physicians with visiting privileges have malpractice insurance. Additionally, some healthcare insurance plans require any doctor who participates in their coverage to be insured.
While the trend of practicing without insurance has decreased in recent years due to tort reform and more affordable professional liability insurance, some doctors still choose to go without it. One primary reason for this decision is the cost of insurance. Additionally, some providers believe that they will be less of a target for lawsuits if they do not have insurance, assuming that attorneys will be less likely to pursue a case if there is a lower potential for "winnable assets."
For doctors who choose to practice in states without mandatory malpractice insurance, it is essential to consider the potential risks and financial consequences. Even in states without insurance requirements, doctors may face significant financial losses if they are successfully sued.
Malpractice Insurance: Are NC Attorneys Covered?
You may want to see also
Some doctors choose to go bare to save money
The cost of malpractice insurance is a significant factor in a doctor's decision to go bare. Medical malpractice insurance is expensive, with some doctors paying tens of thousands of dollars annually for coverage. In the past, premiums were very high, but tort reform in most states has stabilized the market and made insurance more affordable for physicians. However, some doctors still believe that going bare is their only affordable option.
Doctors who go bare may be trying to save money, but they are exposing themselves to significant financial risk. If a doctor is successfully sued, they could end up paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages, not including any legal fees.
In addition, doctors who go bare may still be required to meet certain financial requirements. For example, in Florida, doctors who choose to go without insurance must post a bond, have an escrow account, and get an irrevocable line of credit from a lending agency.
While going bare may save money on insurance premiums, it could end up costing far more in the long run if a doctor is sued for medical malpractice.
Malpractice Insurance: Are Lawyers Required to Have It?
You may want to see also
Doctors who go bare are less likely to be sued
Doctors who choose to go without malpractice insurance or "go bare" believe that they will be less likely to be sued. This is because plaintiffs' attorneys are often less inclined to take a case if the defendant does not have an insurance policy to bring the claim against. Attorneys may assume that proceeding to litigation without an insurance policy would be too risky and may be more inclined to settle for an amount that the defendant is willing to pay.
However, going bare does not guarantee that a doctor will not be sued or face the possibility of paying a plaintiff attorney. Attorneys can still go after the assets of the provider or their business.
In addition, malpractice insurance is required in some states. While there is no federal law that mandates physicians must have medical malpractice insurance, about 18 states require minimum levels of insurance or some insurance to be eligible for liability reforms.
Ohio Insurance CE Credits: Do They Carry Over?
You may want to see also
Some doctors believe malpractice insurance is unaffordable
While malpractice insurance is not a federal requirement for doctors in the US, some states do mandate it. Even in states where it is not required, hospitals and insurance companies may require doctors to have malpractice insurance.
The cost of malpractice insurance is a concern for many doctors. On average, medical malpractice insurance costs $7,500 per year. However, rates vary depending on several factors, including location and the type of doctor seeking coverage. For example, surgeons tend to pay between $30,000 and $50,000 in annual premiums, while other medical professionals typically pay between $4,000 and $12,000 per year. Malpractice insurance costs work out to about 3.2% of most physicians' incomes.
Some doctors believe that malpractice insurance is unaffordable due to the high cost of premiums. In the past, malpractice insurance premiums were very high, but tort reform in many states has helped to stabilize the market and make it more affordable for doctors to acquire this necessary coverage.
One of the primary reasons doctors choose to practice without malpractice insurance is the cost. While tort reform has resulted in a drastic premium reduction in some states, there are still doctors who believe that going without insurance is their only option. This decision can be risky, as it leaves them vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of a malpractice lawsuit.
In addition to the cost of premiums, other factors that contribute to the affordability of malpractice insurance include the type of policy, coverage limits, and liability limits. Claims-made policies, which only cover incidents that occur and are reported while the policy is in effect, tend to be cheaper initially but may require additional "tail coverage" if a claim is filed after the policy has lapsed. Occurrence-based policies, which provide coverage for incidents that occurred during the policy period regardless of when the claim is filed, may be more expensive but offer more comprehensive protection.
The specialty of the doctor is also a significant factor in the cost of malpractice insurance. Physicians in high-risk specialties, such as obstetrics, surgery, and emergency medicine, typically pay much higher premiums than those in other areas of medicine. The frequency of claims made against a physician can also impact their premiums.
While malpractice insurance can be expensive, the consequences of not having it can be even more costly. Malpractice lawsuits can result in significant financial losses for doctors, including legal fees, damages, and lost wages. Therefore, despite the high cost of premiums, malpractice insurance is a crucial investment for doctors to protect their personal assets and ensure they can fairly compensate patients in the event of a mistake.
Chiropractors: Malpractice Insurance—Necessary?
You may want to see also
Doctors in New Jersey must have malpractice insurance
Doctors in New Jersey are required by law to carry a minimum amount of medical malpractice insurance. This is one of seven US states to enforce this requirement, with the amount of coverage depending on the doctor's specialty. For example, physicians in high-risk areas such as surgery will need more coverage for adequate protection.
Malpractice insurance is important for doctors as it protects their professional reputation and finances in the event of a lawsuit. Although there is no federal law requiring doctors to carry medical malpractice insurance, some states enforce this rule. In New Jersey, several hospitals and other facilities also require visiting doctors to have medical malpractice coverage.
New Jersey has a history of high medical malpractice insurance claims, with the state seeing a high frequency of claims and severe cases. However, recent legislation has helped to stabilise premiums and retain physicians in the state.
Certified Mail Insurance: What's Covered?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
There is no federal law requiring doctors to carry medical malpractice insurance, but some states do.
There are seven states that require doctors to maintain a minimum level of malpractice insurance: Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Wisconsin.
32 states do not require doctors to have malpractice insurance. These include Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia.
One of the primary reasons for going without malpractice insurance is cost. Doctors may also choose to go without insurance because they believe they will be less of a target for lawsuits.