Insurance Bias: Black Communities Pay More

There is a long history of racial discrimination and exclusion in the insurance industry, with Black Americans facing barriers to obtaining insurance, including health insurance. While the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has helped to address disparities in health insurance coverage, racial biases persist. This is also true of the auto insurance industry, where predominantly African American communities are quoted premiums that are up to 70% higher than those in predominantly white communities, even when controlling for income and population density. This disparity is not limited to low-income areas, as upper-middle-income Black zip codes have been found to have insurance premiums that are 194% higher than their white counterparts.

Car insurance rates are 70% higher in Black communities

Car insurance rates are significantly higher in Black communities than in white neighbourhoods with similar risk profiles. A nationwide study by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) in 2015 found that predominantly African-American neighbourhoods pay, on average, 70% more for premiums than other areas. This disparity persists even when controlling for factors such as driving history, population density, and income.

The issue of higher car insurance rates in Black communities is not new. In the 1940s, the insurance industry agreed to be regulated by state laws that included prohibitions against discriminatory rate-setting. However, discrimination in insurance rates has persisted, and in many cases, it is implicitly allowed. For example, in Illinois, the state legislature declined to renew the experimental open competition law in 1971, and as a result, Illinois became the only state without legislation explicitly barring excessive or discriminatory rates in car insurance.

The higher insurance rates in Black communities have been attributed to various factors, including higher traffic density in urban areas, which are more likely to have a higher Black population. However, even when accounting for population density, the findings of higher insurance rates in Black neighbourhoods hold true. Additionally, insurance companies have long argued that higher premiums in minority neighbourhoods are due to a higher risk of accidents. Still, this justification has been disputed, with some arguing that it is a form of unfair discrimination.

The communities most affected by the pricing discrepancy include those within Baltimore, New York City, Louisville, Washington, D.C., and Detroit. The CFA's findings and proposed regulatory solutions have sparked discussions among researchers and policymakers, with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners holding a meeting to address the issue.

Health insurance discrimination against Black Americans

The American healthcare system is rife with inequalities that disproportionately affect people of colour and other marginalised groups. These inequalities contribute to gaps in health insurance coverage, uneven access to services, and poorer health outcomes among certain populations. Black Americans face discrimination in obtaining insurance, including health insurance. When plans are offered, insurers often charge higher premiums. This structural racism and implicit bias likely contribute to the racial biases experienced by Black insurance professionals.

The history of racism in the insurance industry is long and well-documented. As far back as the 1880s, the Jim Crow era saw a surge of "scientific" and algorithmic racism in life insurance, with policies that charged Black Americans higher premiums for less coverage. In the 1940s, health insurance companies claimed that differences in "physique" and "temperament" made underwriting health insurance for people of colour challenging. Even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on race, many discriminatory practices remained. As recently as 2022, a study found that Black cancer patients were three times more likely to have been denied health or life insurance.

Certain social factors, or social determinants of health, have important implications for health risk and the ability to attain health insurance coverage. Poverty, income inequality, wealth inequality, food insecurity, and the lack of safe, affordable housing are just a few. Racism is another critical social factor that leads to poor health outcomes and economic disadvantage among Black Americans. It impacts not only social stratification but also the ability of Black Americans to maintain their physical and mental health. These factors contribute to higher rates of morbidity and mortality among Black Americans compared to white Americans for most indicators of physical health.

To address these disparities, states and marketplaces must ensure that individuals leaving Medicaid maintain comprehensive health insurance coverage. Initiatives like broker academies and mentorship programs can assist in health insurance enrollment. State-based health insurance marketplaces are also fostering the development of more brokers of colour to address inequities in the insurance industry. Additionally, increasing the number of minority healthcare professionals can help improve access to care for underserved communities.

Language barriers and immigration rules prevent Hispanics from accessing insurance

Language barriers and immigration rules are significant factors that hinder Hispanics from accessing insurance. Limited English proficiency affects Hispanics' ability to seek and obtain health care, navigate the complex healthcare system, and understand providers' instructions. This language barrier results in inadequate healthcare access and increased emergency department visits. It also contributes to excessive ordering of medical tests and a lack of understanding of medication side effects.

The unique sociopolitical status of undocumented immigrants poses additional challenges. Immigration-related eligibility restrictions, such as strict rules and complex requirements, block some Latinos from enrolling in health insurance programs. These restrictions disproportionately affect undocumented immigrants, who often face challenges in understanding and navigating the enrollment process due to language barriers. Confusion about eligibility rules and fear of negative consequences for their immigration status further deter Hispanics from enrolling in insurance programs.

The low average income and educational attainment of Hispanics also play a role in their difficulty in accessing insurance. Low-income individuals struggle to afford the out-of-pocket costs of care, even with health insurance coverage. Limited education can impair their ability to navigate the complex healthcare system and make informed decisions about their health. These factors, combined with the language barrier, create multiple obstacles for Hispanics seeking insurance coverage.

Furthermore, Hispanics often face barriers to enrolling in health insurance affordability programs such as Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the ACA marketplaces. The eligibility criteria for these programs can be restrictive, and the enrollment process may be daunting for those with limited English proficiency. The intersection of language barriers and immigration rules creates a complex web of challenges that prevents many Hispanics from obtaining the insurance coverage they need.

Black insurance professionals face racial bias

While the insurance industry has eliminated many forms of direct racial discrimination, more subtle forms of discrimination persist. Black insurance professionals face racial bias in several ways. Firstly, there is a lack of representation in the industry. Despite making up 13.5% of the US population, Black individuals only account for 9.3% of insurance brokers. This underrepresentation means that Black insurance professionals may face barriers to career progression and mentorship opportunities within the industry.

Secondly, Black insurance professionals and consumers continue to face systemic racism in the form of discriminatory pricing and coverage. In the auto insurance industry, African Americans are disproportionately represented in higher premium categories, resulting in higher prices for the same coverage. This is driven by the use of socio-economic "factors" in premium setting that do not reflect personal driving history but are proxies for race. For example, auto insurance companies often charge higher premiums to safe drivers who rent their homes, a factor that disproportionately affects African Americans.

Thirdly, health insurance disparities persist, with Black patients being three times more likely to be denied health or life insurance due to a cancer diagnosis than non-Hispanic whites. This is further exacerbated by the fact that brokers do not sufficiently extend services to communities of colour, leading to lower insurance coverage rates among Black Americans.

Finally, the use of big data and unregulated algorithms in insurance pricing has been criticised as a form of racial bias. Unregulated datasets collect information on individuals' race, age, occupation, education, and other factors, which are then used by insurance companies to set rates and underwriting standards. This can result in higher premiums for African Americans, even when factors such as credit history and education level are not explicitly considered.

To address these issues, state-based health insurance marketplaces are fostering the development of more brokers of colour and intervening to increase diversity within the insurance sector. Additionally, some states have taken action to prohibit the use of certain factors, such as credit history and education level, in auto insurance rating. However, more comprehensive federal and state regulation is needed to address the use of big data and algorithms in insurance pricing and to truly reform the insurance market to eliminate racially discriminatory practices.

Urban areas with higher Black populations have higher insurance premiums

This issue is particularly prominent in Illinois, where 33 out of 34 companies were found to charge at least 10% more, on average, for the same safe driver in minority zip codes than in similarly risky white zip codes. Six Illinois insurers, including the state's second-largest insurer, Allstate, had average disparities of over 30%. In fact, Illinois is the only state without legislation explicitly barring excessive or discriminatory rates in car insurance.

The root of this problem lies in the history of racial discrimination and exclusion in the insurance industry. Insurers have employed "scientific" racism to justify higher premiums for Black households. This legacy of structural racism and implicit bias has resulted in racial discrimination within insurance policies, with Black communities facing higher insurance premiums even when controlling for population density.

The impact of this discrimination is far-reaching. Higher insurance premiums contribute to the financial burden on Black households, exacerbating existing economic inequalities. Additionally, the underrepresentation of Black insurance professionals, due to racial bias and a lack of mentorship and career opportunities, further perpetuates the issue.

Addressing these disparities requires regulatory solutions and legal interventions to close the loopholes that disadvantage Black communities. Initiatives like state-based health insurance marketplaces are working to foster the development of more brokers of color to address inequities in the industry.

Frequently asked questions