Tort Auto Insurance: Understanding Full Coverage In Pa

When choosing a car insurance policy in Pennsylvania, you have the option of selecting full tort or limited tort coverage. This refers to your ability to sue for pain and suffering damages after a car accident. Full tort coverage allows you to sue for pain and suffering after any accident, regardless of severity, whereas limited tort coverage restricts your ability to sue and only covers monetary losses.

Full tort insurance allows lawsuits for pain and suffering

In Pennsylvania, drivers have the option to choose between full tort and limited tort auto insurance. While limited tort insurance restricts the compensation a person can get from a case, full tort insurance allows lawsuits for pain and suffering.

Full tort insurance gives the injury victim an unrestricted right to seek compensation for injuries from the at-fault driver. This means that with full tort coverage, you can sue for medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage, as well as non-economic damages, commonly known as pain and suffering. For instance, if you develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after a car accident and are no longer able to drive, you can sue the at-fault driver for the impact of PTSD on your life.

Full tort insurance is more expensive than limited tort coverage, with premiums approximately 10 to 15% higher. However, limited tort policies do not cover all the damages that can result from an auto accident, and policyholders are limited in their recovery. While a limited tort policy may cover medical bills and out-of-pocket expenses, pain and suffering, as well as general damages, are not covered. Only in cases of serious bodily injury or specific exceptions can a limited tort policyholder sue for pain and suffering.

The four exceptions to the serious bodily injury requirement for limited tort policyholders are:

• The other driver committed an intentional act that caused the injuries.
• The other driver was operating a vehicle registered in a state other than Pennsylvania.
• The other driver had no insurance.
• The other driver was under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

While limited tort insurance may be appealing due to its lower cost, it's important to consider the potential risks and restrictions. Car accidents can have lasting and harmful effects, and full tort insurance provides the option to seek compensation for these long-term impacts.

Limited tort insurance is cheaper but offers less protection

In the context of auto insurance, tort refers to the right to sue a driver who caused an accident for damages. Full tort and limited tort are two types of auto insurance policies that differ in terms of the level of protection they offer and their cost. Limited tort insurance is cheaper than full tort insurance but offers less protection in terms of the right to sue and the types of damages covered.

Limited tort insurance is a type of auto insurance policy that restricts the policyholder's right to sue the at-fault driver. With limited tort insurance, you can only sue the at-fault driver in cases of serious impairment, loss of limb, permanent disfigurement, or an injury that prevents you from working for the rest of your life. It does not cover all the damages that can result from an auto accident and provides limited recovery. While it covers monetary damages such as medical bills and out-of-pocket expenses, it does not cover pain and suffering or general damages. Only in cases of serious bodily injury, which is defined by the state, can you sue for pain and suffering under a limited tort policy.

On the other hand, full tort insurance offers broader protection and allows you to sue the at-fault driver without restrictions. You can sue for injuries, impairments, and pain and suffering, even if they are not considered serious. Full tort insurance provides the potential for higher compensation and covers a wider range of damages related to an accident.

The choice between limited tort and full tort depends on individual circumstances, budget constraints, and the likelihood of filing a lawsuit. Limited tort insurance can save you up to 40% on your insurance premiums, making it a more affordable option for young drivers or those on a tight budget. However, it's important to consider the potential long-term costs if a serious accident occurs. Full tort insurance, while more expensive, provides greater peace of mind and the ability to seek broader financial reimbursement in the event of a serious accident.

In summary, limited tort insurance offers limited protection by restricting the right to sue and the types of damages covered. While it is a cheaper option, it may result in more out-of-pocket expenses if a serious accident occurs. Full tort insurance, on the other hand, provides more comprehensive protection and allows for a wider range of damages to be claimed. The decision between limited and full tort ultimately depends on individual needs, budget, and risk tolerance.

Full tort insurance is more expensive but offers more protection

In the state of Pennsylvania, drivers can choose between full tort and limited tort insurance. Tort insurance allows auto insurance companies to recover damages from the party that caused an accident. The option between limited and full tort was introduced in Pennsylvania in the late 1980s to curb rising car insurance rates.

Full tort insurance is more expensive than limited tort insurance, but it offers more protection. With full tort insurance, you have the unrestricted right to sue an at-fault driver for medical expenses, lost income, vehicle repairs, and pain and suffering. This includes minor injuries such as a sprained wrist or broken ankle. The money won in a lawsuit can be used to offset medical bills and lost income. In contrast, limited tort insurance only allows you to sue for monetary damages in most cases.

Full tort insurance provides more protection in the short and long term, making it the ideal coverage if you live in a state where it's optional. However, if you're on a strict budget, limited tort insurance might be a more affordable option. It's important to consider your budget, the number of drivers in your household, and your source of income when deciding between full tort and limited tort insurance.

For example, parents are the most common group to select full tort insurance because they have a responsibility to their children and want to secure a healthy settlement in case of a serious accident. On the other hand, young drivers often choose limited tort insurance because it's more affordable, and they may not be as likely to sue after an accident.

Limited tort insurance has restrictions on what you can sue for

Limited tort insurance places restrictions on the policyholder's ability to sue for pain and suffering damages in a car accident. In other words, limited tort insurance does not cover all the damages that can result from an auto accident, and policyholders are only entitled to limited recovery following an accident. A household with a limited tort policy may receive compensation for monetary damages only, such as medical bills and out-of-pocket expenses.

There are, however, exceptions to the rule. Limited tort policyholders can sue for pain and suffering if they are considered to be suffering serious bodily injury. The four exceptions to the serious bodily injury requirement are:

• The other driver committed an intentional act that caused the injuries
• The other driver was operating a vehicle registered in a state other than Pennsylvania
• The other driver had no insurance
• The at-fault driver was under the influence of drugs or alcohol

In addition, motorcyclists who are hit by cars have full tort protection.

Limited tort insurance is less expensive than full tort insurance, saving one between 10% and 15% on premiums.

Full tort insurance has no restrictions on what you can sue for

In Pennsylvania, drivers have the option to choose between full tort and limited tort auto insurance policies. While limited tort insurance restricts the compensation a person can receive, full tort insurance has no restrictions on what you can sue for.

Full tort insurance allows drivers to sue for pain and suffering after a not-at-fault accident, regardless of the severity of the injury. This means that even if the injury is minor, such as back pain or long-term damage, drivers with full tort insurance can take legal action against the at-fault driver. This type of insurance provides the most potential for receiving different forms of compensation related to an accident. It covers non-economic damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering.

The main advantage of full tort insurance is that it offers unrestricted rights to seek compensation. This is especially important for individuals who want the option to sue for non-monetary issues, such as pain and suffering. For example, if someone develops post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after an accident and is no longer able to drive, they can sue the at-fault driver for the impact on their life.

However, full tort insurance also has some drawbacks. One of the main disadvantages is the cost. Full tort insurance is more expensive than limited tort coverage, with premium payments approximately 10 to 15% higher. This higher cost is due to the increased number of options and broader rights to compensation that full tort insurance provides. As a result, some individuals may find that the benefits of full tort coverage do not outweigh the additional expense.

Frequently asked questions