The Evolution Of P2p Insurance: A New Era Of Risk Sharing And Community Trust

Peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance is a decentralised insurance model that allows a group of people to pool their money together to cover each other for various risks. This type of insurance is often chosen by people who are dedicated to a common cause or are already part of a group, such as a family. P2P insurance is also a good option for small businesses as it is a low-cost alternative to traditional insurance. In P2P insurance, policyholders have more control over management decisions than they do with traditional insurance companies, and they may get back excess premiums or have them donated to a chosen charity.

P2P insurance groups: Members form groups and contribute to a collective fund

P2P insurance, or peer-to-peer insurance, is a product that lets a group of people pool their money together to cover each other for various risks. Typically, these people are family, friends, or individuals who share similar interests or activities. Policyholders get more control over management decisions than they do with traditional insurance companies, and they may get back excess premiums or donate them to a charity.

P2P insurance groups are formed when members contribute to a collective fund. This fund is used to cover individual losses, with the idea that each insured person is responsible for the entire group's risk profile and refund. This motivates members to maintain low individual risk to keep costs low for everyone. If there is no claim, the insurance premiums are reduced, and the leftover funds are returned to the group. If the group fund is insufficient to cover a claim, a reinsurance company covers the difference.

There are typically three types of P2P schemes: the self-organizing model, the broker model, and the carrier or collaborative model. In the self-organizing model, members enter without paying an initial commission but sign a contract agreeing to contribute to the group's total losses. The broker model involves an intermediary, usually an insurance broker, who creates, supports, and manages the groups of peers. The carrier model, launched by Lemonade, offers a fully digital and efficient customer relationship.

The advantages of P2P insurance include lower costs, increased control over management decisions, and the potential for excess premiums to be returned to members. However, there may be less coverage than with a traditional insurer, and it may not be available in all locations.

P2P vs traditional insurance: Traditional insurance is centralised, P2P is decentralised

This article will explore the key differences between traditional insurance and P2P insurance, focusing on the centralised and decentralised nature of each system. We will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each model and how they impact consumers.

Traditional Insurance: Centralised and Standardised

Traditional insurance operates as a centralised system, where a large company collects money from policyholders and pays out claims. The insurance provider is a central authority that manages financial assets and sets the rules for how assets are traded. This system is standardised, with common policies, processes and best practices applied across the industry. Each policyholder deals only with the insurance company, which is tightly regulated and required to have sufficient financial resources to cover large losses.

P2P Insurance: Decentralised and Flexible

In contrast, P2P insurance is a decentralised network, where participants pool their resources to compensate those who suffer losses. P2P insurers form groups of people with similar insurance needs, and each member contributes to cover potential financial losses. In the event of a claim, the contribution is directed to the affected individual, with any remaining funds returned to the group or donated to charity. P2P insurance platforms are typically managed by a peer group and automated with technology, reducing costs and increasing transparency.

Advantages of P2P Insurance

One of the main benefits of P2P insurance is the increased control it gives to policyholders. Members of a P2P group can decide what they want to insure, how much coverage they need, and the length of the policy term. They also have a say in which claims get paid, as decisions are made by the group or through a voting mechanism. P2P insurance also tends to be more transparent and efficient, with quicker claims processing and reduced risk of fraud.

Disadvantages of P2P Insurance

One potential downside of P2P insurance is the possibility of less coverage compared to traditional insurers. P2P insurance companies may not have the same level of financial resources to cover large losses, and there may be insufficient funds to pay a claim when needed. Additionally, P2P insurance is heavily regulated, and there may not be much flexibility in creating a P2P company, limiting the availability of this model.

In summary, P2P insurance offers a decentralised alternative to the centralised nature of traditional insurance. It provides increased control, transparency and efficiency for policyholders, but may have limitations in terms of coverage and availability. The P2P model has gained attention and could represent a significant shift in the insurance industry, but it remains to be seen if it will become a widely adopted alternative to traditional insurance.

Advantages of P2P insurance: Cheaper, more transparent, and easier to make claims

Peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance is a novel concept that has gained popularity in the insurtech era. It is a shift from traditional insurance structures, intertwining technology with the community and reshaping how people think about and engage with insurance. P2P insurance has several advantages over traditional insurance, including being cheaper, more transparent, and easier to make claims.

Cheaper

P2P insurance is often cheaper than traditional insurance because it operates with reduced overhead and fewer intermediaries. This streamlined operational model can lead to cost savings, which are passed on to the members. In the P2P model, members contribute to a collective fund that is used to cover losses incurred by any individual in the group. Any remaining funds at the end of the coverage period can be returned to the members, providing a saving opportunity. Traditional insurance companies, on the other hand, keep unused premium funds as profits.

More Transparent

P2P insurance emphasizes open communication and transparency among its members. It provides clear insights into premium utilization, claims handling, and fund distribution, ensuring that members know how their contributions are allocated. This transparency fosters a sense of trust and community among the group. Blockchain technology further enhances transparency and security in P2P insurance models.

Easier to Make Claims

Making claims is generally easier with P2P insurance due to its decentralized and member-centric nature. The claims process is often swifter and more transparent, with legitimate claims receiving payouts faster than in conventional systems. This is because P2P insurers do not gain anything from denying claims, as any leftover funds are returned to the members anyway. In contrast, traditional insurance companies may have a monetary incentive to deny claims, leading to a complicated and drawn-out claims process. Additionally, P2P insurance claims are typically digitized, resulting in faster payout times compared to the lengthy paperwork and rigorous processes associated with traditional insurance.

Disadvantages of P2P insurance: Not widely available, lacks personal contact, and no guarantee of payment

P2P insurance, or peer-to-peer insurance, is a relatively new form of insurance that has emerged in developed countries. It allows a group of people to pool their money to cover each other for various risks. While P2P insurance offers benefits such as increased transparency, less fraud, and refunds of unused money, there are also several disadvantages to this model.

One of the main disadvantages of P2P insurance is its limited availability. The concept is complex and requires vigilant and educated customers. As most people struggle to understand traditional insurance products, they may find it challenging to grasp the intricacies of P2P insurance. This lack of understanding may deter potential customers from adopting this new model, preferring to stick with more familiar insurance companies.

Another drawback of P2P insurance is the lack of personal contact and trust between group members. In traditional insurance, policyholders deal directly with the insurance company on a one-to-one basis. In contrast, P2P insurance groups consist of people who know each other or share similar characteristics. While this creates transparency, it may also breed discontent, especially among risk-averse members. If people with different risk profiles are grouped together, those who are careful about risk management may end up paying more, while rash members benefit. Over time, this could lead to dissatisfaction and potentially the dissolution of the group.

Furthermore, P2P insurance may not provide a guarantee of payment. While P2P groups pay for reinsurance as a safety measure, there is still a risk of insufficient funds to pay claims. In such cases, the group may need to make a reinsurance claim, but this is not always guaranteed. Additionally, P2P insurance is not subject to the same regulatory requirements as traditional insurance companies, and state insurance regulators may not supervise them. Consequently, there may be uncertainty about whether claims will be paid, and policyholders may need to closely examine the insurer and policy to ensure their protection.

In conclusion, while P2P insurance offers certain advantages, it also faces challenges such as limited availability due to its complexity, potential dissatisfaction among group members, and the risk of insufficient funds to cover claims. These factors may hinder the widespread adoption of P2P insurance as a dominant insurance model.

P2P insurance models: Broker model and carrier model

P2P insurance, or peer-to-peer insurance, is a reciprocity insurance contract that allows a group of people to pool their money to cover each other's risks. This model combines traditional pooling and sharing of losses with current technology and innovations, providing a product for savvy consumers who require transparency.

The two main types of P2P insurance models are the broker model and the carrier model.

Broker Model

In the broker model, insurance policyholders form small groups online. A portion of the insurance premiums paid flow into a group fund, and the other portion goes to a third-party insurance company. Minor damages to the insured policyholder are paid out of this group fund. For claims above the deductible limit, the regular insurer is called upon. If there is no insurance claim, the policyholder gets their share refunded from the group pool or credited towards the next policy year. If the group fund is empty, a special insurance comes into force.

In the broker model, the peer-to-peer insurance concept carries no costs other than the special insurance. The providers are financed through brokerage commissions from insurance companies.

One of the earliest peer-to-peer insurance broker models was developed by the German company Friendsurance, which launched in 2010.

Carrier Model

The carrier model is similar to the broker model, except that the peer-to-peer provider is the actual insurance company. If the pool is insufficient to pay for the claims of its members, the insurance carrier pays the excess from its retained premiums and reinsurance. Conversely, if the pool has few claims, the excess is given back to the pool or to a cause the pool members care about. Peer-to-peer insurers take a flat fee for running the operations of the insurance enterprise.

In the carrier model, the peer-to-peer insurance concept carries only the fixed fee to the carrier's management and the cost of reinsurance and other minor expenses.

While P2P insurance has gained attention in recent years, it is not an entirely new concept. It represents a return to the old roots of insurance, leveraging the latest technological advances in social networking to apply the model mutual insurance companies have used since the early days of insurance. The core idea of P2P insurance is to improve the entire community, with benefits accruing to all participating members.

Frequently asked questions