Obama's Insurance Spike Legacy

Many people blame Obama for insurance spikes due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Obama had promised that people who liked their existing health insurance plans would be able to keep them, but this turned out to be untrue as millions of Americans received cancellation letters for their health insurance. The Obama administration was aware that many individuals would not be able to retain their current coverage, but they argued that these people would be offered improved coverage options and that tax subsidies would offset any increased costs. However, the reality was that many individuals experienced sticker shock when they saw significant increases in their insurance premiums.

Obama's promise that people could keep their health insurance plans

The controversy stems from the fact that the Affordable Care Act established new standards for health insurance plans, which many existing plans did not meet. While the law stated that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010, would be "grandfathered", meaning consumers could keep those policies, the Department of Health and Human Services wrote regulations that narrowed this provision. If any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date—such as the deductible, co-pay, or benefits—the policy would not be grandfathered. As a result, many people who liked their existing health insurance plans were forced to switch to new, often more expensive, plans that met the new standards.

The Obama administration was aware that this would be the case for a significant number of people. Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that due to normal turnover in the individual insurance market, "40 to 67 percent" of customers would not be able to keep their policy. Despite this knowledge, President Obama continued to assure Americans that they would be able to keep their health insurance plans if they liked them.

The impact of this promise and its subsequent breaking was significant. Many people experienced sticker shock as they were forced to purchase pricier new policies. Small businesses, in particular, faced challenges as they struggled to find affordable plans that met the new standards. The controversy also fuelled criticism of the Affordable Care Act and led to a decline in public approval of the law and the Obama administration.

In defence of the promise, the White House argued that while some people would lose their current coverage, they would be offered better coverage with more benefits, such as mental health care, and protections against discrimination or higher charges based on pre-existing conditions. Additionally, the White House noted that many people would receive tax subsidies to offset any increased costs.

The Affordable Care Act

However, the implementation of the Affordable Care Act has had mixed results. On the one hand, it has successfully expanded health insurance coverage to millions, with 8 million signing up for Obamacare by 2014, and reduced the number of uninsured Americans. This was particularly beneficial for children and students who could remain on their parents' plans, and for those with pre-existing conditions who previously struggled to obtain insurance.

On the other hand, the Act has been criticised for resulting in insurance spikes, or premium increases, for some groups. This is particularly true for younger, healthier individuals who previously benefited from lower premiums due to their lower health costs. The Affordable Care Act introduced an age band, limiting the amount an older individual pays to three times that of a younger person, which resulted in premium spikes for younger people. Additionally, insurance companies can no longer charge different premiums based on a person's health status, meaning healthier individuals generally face higher premiums to subsidise the costs of covering those with pre-existing conditions.

The impact of the Affordable Care Act on insurance premiums is complex and varies depending on individual circumstances. While some have experienced premium spikes, others have seen their costs stabilise or decrease, particularly if they are receiving tax credits or subsidies. Overall, the Act has resulted in a significant expansion of health insurance coverage, but it has also led to increased costs for certain groups, demonstrating the complex trade-offs inherent in healthcare reform.

Corporate greed

The Affordable Care Act, or "Obamacare", was signed into law in 2010 by President Barack Obama. The primary goal of Obamacare was to make health insurance more affordable and extend its reach to those who were too poor to pay or too sick to qualify. Despite the law's good intentions, insurance companies have been blamed for raising their premiums, which they claim is a result of the Act. However, critics argue that this is not the case, and that the real reason behind the rise in health insurance costs is corporate greed.

Insurance companies have been raising their subscribers' premiums for years, even before Obama was president. One commentator, who has a family plan and covers employees' healthcare at two small businesses, states that their premiums have increased at least once a year for the past five years. When they phone the insurance company to ask why, they are met with silence or no explanation. The president of Kaiser, an insurance company, stated that healthcare reform is not the reason for the increased premiums; at best, it might contribute to 1%. So, what is the reason for the other 99%?

The commentator argues that due to the increased number of people being covered by the reform act, there are more people purchasing plans, which brings more money to insurance companies. Yet, despite this increase in revenue, insurance companies continue to raise premiums without offering any additional benefits. The commentator believes that the reason for this is greed, as all the heads of these insurance companies earn millions of dollars a year. Insurance companies are one of the few industries in America that have not been negatively affected by the economy, and their stock prices continue to rise.

The increase in premiums, whether for an HMO or PPO, supports the need for healthcare reform and a public option. Insurance companies will argue that people are requesting higher deductibles, but this is because most people want to pay less per month and take the risk of not needing emergency care or surgery. However, as the commentator's doctor-husband (an orthopedic surgeon) points out, this is a big risk. Patients used to come to him when they were in pain, but now they come when their bones are sticking out and their condition is chronic. The increased prices by insurance companies are hurting the healthcare system, doctors' ability to provide proper care, and the economy.

In conclusion, while some may blame Obama and the Affordable Care Act for the rise in insurance spikes, the true culprit is corporate greed. Insurance companies have been raising premiums for years, and the increased number of customers and federal subsidies should have led to lower, not higher, premiums. The insurance industry has enjoyed increased revenue from millions of new customers, and their shareholders have thrived. The real losers in this game are the American people, who are struggling to afford the rising costs of healthcare.

Increased number of insured people

The Affordable Care Act, also known as "Obamacare", was passed with the intention of making health insurance more accessible and affordable for Americans. One of the key goals was to increase the number of people with health insurance, particularly those with pre-existing conditions who may have struggled to obtain insurance previously.

The law achieved this by requiring insurers to accept everyone, regardless of their health status, and by allowing young adults to stay on their parents' insurance plans for longer. Additionally, the creation of health insurance exchanges, where individuals and small businesses could shop for insurance plans, was expected to increase competition and drive down costs.

However, one unintended consequence of these changes was an increase in insurance premiums for some groups, particularly younger and healthier individuals. This occurred because the law implemented an age band, limiting the amount an older individual pays to three times what a younger individual pays. As a result, younger people saw their premiums increase to subsidise the cost of insurance for older people.

Another factor contributing to premium spikes was the requirement that insurers provide an "essential health benefits" package, which included a range of services such as mental health care, prescription drug coverage, and maternity and newborn care. While this ensured that people had access to comprehensive health care, it also increased the cost of insurance plans, particularly for those who previously had more basic coverage.

It is important to note that the impact of the Affordable Care Act on insurance premiums was complex and varied. While some groups experienced increases, others, such as older individuals with pre-existing conditions, saw their premiums decrease. Additionally, tax subsidies were introduced to help offset the cost of insurance for lower-income individuals.

Overall, while there was indeed an increase in the number of insured people, the impact on insurance premiums was mixed, with some groups benefiting from lower costs while others faced spikes in their premiums.

Essential health benefits package

The "Essential Health Benefits" package is a set of 10 categories of services that health insurance plans must cover under the Affordable Care Act (also known as "Obamacare"). These essential health benefits (EHBs) include:

• Ambulatory patient services (outpatient services)
• Emergency services
• Hospitalization
• Maternity and newborn care
• Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioural health treatment
• Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
• Prescription drugs
• Laboratory services
• Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
• Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

The Affordable Care Act eliminated caps on how much coverage people received for these essential health benefits, ensuring that patients have more health benefits and a lesser financial burden. While plans before the Affordable Care Act stated that they covered many of these services, actual coverage was often uneven, with patients facing unexpected dollar limits on services.

The EHBs are designed to ensure that everyone in the individual and small group health insurance markets has access to comprehensive coverage that meets their needs. However, critics of the Affordable Care Act have argued that the requirement to cover these essential health benefits has contributed to rising insurance premiums. They argue that the benefits are more extensive than what most individuals and small businesses previously purchased, leading to higher costs.

Frequently asked questions