Private Insurance: Worth The Fight?

Private health insurance is a contentious issue, with some arguing for its removal and others for its retention. While critics point to the profit motive of private insurance companies as a reason for their negative impact on patients and physicians, proponents of private insurance argue that it fosters competition, innovation, and efficiency. Private insurance companies compete on price, quality, and customer service, resulting in a diverse range of choices for consumers. Additionally, private insurance plays a crucial role in covering the costs of new medical technologies that improve patient health. However, private insurance is not without its challenges, as rising costs, particularly in mental health services, are causing a strain on both individuals and businesses.

Private insurance companies compete on price, quality, and customer service

Private insurance companies compete on price, and this is reflected in the average premiums of the best health insurance companies. Kaiser Permanente, for example, offers the lowest average premium among the companies analysed. Aetna has the lowest complaint level, which can indicate higher customer satisfaction with claims and customer service. Oscar has one of the lowest overall costs for bronze plans, which typically have the lowest premiums but also come with high deductibles. Blue Cross Blue Shield has a large provider network of over 1.7 million in-network providers, and its plans are accepted in all 50 states.

Private insurance companies also compete on quality. For example, Kaiser Permanente has an integrated health system, which offers health insurance coverage and services through its network of hospitals, clinics, and physicians. Aetna is owned by CVS Health, which provides members a $25 allowance every three months to shop at CVS Health and a 20% discount on CVS Health brand products. Blue Cross Blue Shield has the highest digital experience score among the companies analysed, including the option to pay premiums online and manage your account.

Private insurance companies also compete on customer service. For example, Oscar has a friendly online portal for clients, and you often don't need a referral to see a specialist. Blue Cross Blue Shield is one of the few marketplace carriers that offer a PPO in most states, which can be important for people who have more medical needs and have to see more doctors.

Private insurance companies can efficiently monitor spending through administration and utilisation reviews

One such tool is legislation and licensing, which set up the legal framework for health insurance and ensure new insurers comply with regulatory requirements. Monitoring is another critical tool, encompassing financial status reporting, health services utilisation, and grievance procedures. Auditing, both automatic and randomised, is also employed to maintain or improve compliance with reporting requirements.

By gathering and analysing data through these tools, private insurance companies can make informed decisions about spending and identify areas where costs can be reduced without compromising on the quality of care. This enables them to efficiently monitor and manage their spending, ensuring that funds are allocated appropriately and that consumers receive the coverage they need.

Additionally, private insurance companies can implement utilisation reviews, which involve evaluating health services utilisation patterns, enrolment, claims experience, and administrative costs. This information can be used to forecast potential financial risks and make adjustments to spending as necessary.

Through these comprehensive administration and utilisation reviews, private insurance companies can effectively manage their resources, ensure compliance with regulations, and make data-driven decisions to optimise their operations.

Private insurance companies can help address the root causes of poor mental health

Private insurance companies can play a crucial role in addressing the root causes of poor mental health and improving access to mental health services. Here are some ways in which private insurance companies can make a positive impact:

• Reducing Financial Barriers: High costs and insufficient insurance coverage are often cited as significant barriers to accessing mental health treatment. Private insurance companies can help by providing comprehensive mental health coverage, including reimbursement for psychotherapy, counseling, and psychosocial rehabilitation, which are essential components of mental healthcare. This will ensure that individuals are not forced to choose between getting treatment and affording daily necessities.
• Improving Accessibility: Private insurance companies can partner with a diverse range of mental health providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and clinical social workers, to ensure that their clients have access to a wide range of treatment options. By contracting with a variety of mental health professionals, private insurance can improve accessibility and reduce wait times, which are currently a challenge in the mental healthcare system.
• Innovative Solutions: Private insurance companies have the flexibility to develop innovative solutions and benefits packages that meet the unique needs of individuals with mental health issues. They can offer coverage for alternative treatments, such as telehealth services, which can be especially beneficial for those in rural areas or with limited mobility.
• Focus on Prevention: Private insurance companies can prioritize preventive care and early intervention by providing coverage for regular mental health assessments and counseling sessions. This shift in focus can help address mental health issues before they become more severe and require more costly interventions.
• Customized Treatment Plans: Private insurance companies can work closely with mental health professionals to develop customized treatment plans for their clients. By recognizing that each individual's needs are unique, insurance companies can ensure that their clients receive the specific type and duration of treatment required for their particular mental health disorder.
• Addressing Stigma: Private insurance companies can play a role in reducing the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment. By including mental health coverage in their policies and actively promoting these benefits, insurance companies can help normalize the act of seeking professional help for mental health issues.

In conclusion, private insurance companies have the potential to address the root causes of poor mental health by improving access to treatment, reducing financial barriers, and providing innovative solutions. Their role in the mental healthcare system can be crucial in ensuring that individuals receive the care they need to manage and improve their mental well-being.

Private insurance companies are incentivised to underprovide to sick people

Firstly, federal requirements in the US mandate that health plans cannot discriminate against enrollees based on health status. While this "no discrimination" rule is intended to protect individuals from being charged premiums that reflect their expected healthcare costs, it also means that health plans make a profit on healthy enrollees and lose money on sick enrollees. This creates a perverse incentive for insurance companies to attract healthy individuals and discourage sick individuals from enrolling.

In contrast, healthcare providers such as hospitals operate in a different legal environment and can advertise their services to attract patients, including those with complex or expensive health needs. Hospitals can charge full price for their services, which is something health insurers cannot do within the constraints of the "no discrimination" rule.

The dynamics of the healthcare system also contribute to the problem. In a rational insurance market, individuals would pay out of pocket for inexpensive services and rely on insurance for rare and costly expenses. However, the typical employer health plan provides free or low-cost primary care but requires individuals to pay high out-of-pocket costs for hospitalisations or specialised treatments. This discourages sick individuals from seeking necessary care and further incentivises insurance companies to minimise costs associated with sick enrollees.

The profit motive is another factor influencing the behaviour of private insurance companies. Some critics argue that the pursuit of profits leads to underprovision of care and patient neglect, as exemplified by the investigation into the Texas Medicaid program, where private insurers were found to be providing inadequate care.

While government insurance may face similar incentives, the issue of underprovision by private insurers is particularly concerning given the significant role of private insurance in the US healthcare system. Approximately one-third of Medicare enrollees in the US are participating in private insurance plans, and two-thirds of Medicaid enrollees are enrolled in private plans that benefit financially from providing less care.

Private insurance companies can be criticised for throwing red tape in the way of patients and physicians

One of the main ways that red tape affects patients is by delaying care. Prior authorization, a health plan cost-control process, requires physicians to obtain approval for prescribed treatments or services before they can be delivered to the patient. This can cause significant delays in treatment, and 92% of physicians surveyed by the AMA reported that patients whose treatment requires prior authorization experience care delays. In addition, 80% of physicians said that patients sometimes, often, or always abandoned the recommended treatment or test because of issues related to prior authorization.

The process of prior authorization can also be costly and inefficient, and it can lead to negative clinical outcomes for patients. It can be difficult for physicians to keep up with the rapidly changing requirements and health plan drug lists, and as a result, patients may face delays in receiving their medications. In some cases, patients may have to make additional trips to the pharmacy and endure periods of untreated conditions while waiting for approval.

Furthermore, private insurance companies have been criticised for their narrow provider networks, which can exclude the best doctors and hospitals. This can make it difficult for patients to find in-network providers who are accepting new patients, leading to longer wait times and reduced access to care. In some cases, insurance directories may be outdated or inaccurate, providing false information about which providers are in-network and further complicating the process of finding care.

Frequently asked questions