Insurers: Less Money, More Problems?

Are auto insurers offering less to claimants? This is a question that has been on many people's minds, and for good reason. A recent investigation by Which? revealed that a third of car insurers are rated poorly by claimants, indicating that there may be an issue with the settlement amounts being offered. This is supported by the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) findings, which show that some insurers are systematically offering lower cash settlements for 'total loss' claims, where a car has been stolen or written off.

This issue has also been highlighted by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB), which found that auto insurers lose billions of dollars annually due to premium leakage and fraudulent practices. Additionally, uninsured or underinsured motorists add further complexity to the situation, as they may not have sufficient coverage to compensate claimants fairly.

So, what does this mean for claimants? It is important to be vigilant and informed when dealing with insurance companies. Understanding your policy, knowing your rights, and seeking legal assistance if needed, can help ensure that you receive a fair settlement. It is also crucial to report any accidents or incidents to your insurer, even if you don't plan to make a claim, as this can impact your coverage and protect you in case a third party decides to claim.

In conclusion, while it is challenging to determine if auto insurers are definitively offering less to claimants, it is clear that claimants often face an uphill battle when seeking compensation. Being proactive, informed, and assertive can help ensure a more positive outcome.

Claimants are offered less due to the use of trade guides to estimate market value

Trade guides, such as the Kelley Blue Book, can be used to determine the fair market value of a car. This value is based on data such as trade-in value, private party value, and other areas of research. The fair market value is the price that an asset would sell for under current market conditions, assuming that both the buyer and seller are seeking the best possible price. This value is used by insurance companies to determine claim payouts.

When it comes to auto insurance claims, the fair market value of a vehicle is an important factor in determining how much the insurance company will pay out to the claimant. The insurance company will typically cover damages up to the vehicle's fair market value. This means that if the cost of repairing the vehicle exceeds its fair market value, the insurance company may declare it a total loss and offer the claimant a payout equal to the vehicle's fair market value rather than covering the cost of repairs.

In some cases, the insurance company may also take into account other factors, such as the age and condition of the vehicle, to determine the appropriate payout amount. If the vehicle is older or has high mileage, the insurance company may offer a lower payout, as the vehicle's fair market value may be lower.

Additionally, the use of trade guides to estimate the market value of a vehicle can also impact the amount offered to claimants. Trade-in value, for example, is the price a dealer would offer for a consumer's vehicle when purchasing another car from the dealer's inventory. This value is often lower than the private party value, which is the price expected for a vehicle sales transaction between two consumers.

Overall, the use of trade guides to estimate market value can result in claimants being offered less by insurance companies, especially if the vehicle is older, has high mileage, or is being traded in rather than sold privately.

Claimants may be pressured into accepting a low initial settlement offer

When you file an insurance claim, you wait for one pivotal moment: the insurer will extend a settlement offer. This juncture is laden with decisions. Do you accept the offer, potentially closing your claim? Or do you reject it, opening a new chapter in your claim's journey?

The first settlement offer is usually just that, one of perhaps many offers to come as part of the settlement negotiation process, and it's almost never a good idea to accept a first offer from the insurance company. The initial offer may not align with your needs or reflect the full extent of your losses. You have the right to carefully evaluate the offer and, if it falls short of what you believe is fair and adequate, reject it.

The insurance company isn't interested in paying you a fair settlement. That's not how the company makes money. It makes money by not paying you at all. And if it does have to pay you, the insurer is looking for the cheapest settlement it can get. The insurance company handles thousands of claims like yours every year. The adjuster has learned from experience that sometimes, unrepresented claimants can be bullied into a quick, cheap settlement. You've been injured and you might be out of work. The bills are piling up and you've got no money coming in. You're an easy target. There's little incentive for the adjuster to make you a fair offer, at least not yet.

In a total loss claim, your insurer will either offer to replace your car with a like-for-like model or, more commonly, provide a cash settlement reflecting its value as of immediately before the accident. This is likely to be substantially less than what you initially bought the car for – especially if it was bought new – as they notoriously lose value quickly.

Insurers instead use a variety of information sources, such as trade guides, to estimate the car's 'market value'. While these estimates can be challenged and revised, insurers aren't supposed to make 'opening' offers that they know to be less than the customer is entitled to. However, in its review, the FCA commented that some of the firms it examined 'would sometimes provide initial settlement offers that are below the insured vehicle's estimated market value or at the lower end of an identified range'.

In summary, claimants may be pressured into accepting a low initial settlement offer because the insurance company is incentivized to pay out as little as possible, and the initial offer is often strategically low to encourage a quick resolution.

Claimants may be unaware of their right to challenge the original offer

Claimants may be unaware that they have the right to challenge an original offer from an insurance company. Insurance companies are expert negotiators and will use tactics to pressure claimants into accepting their initial offer. However, claimants have the right to refuse or defer an offer and seek legal advice.

Insurance companies are incentivised to pay claimants less than they deserve. They make low offers in the hope that claimants will accept and save the company money. They may even try to pressure claimants into taking their deal. It is important for claimants to remember that they do not have to accept an offer and can instead refer the insurance company to their attorney.

Claimants can also request a re-examination of their claim. They should review their claim and coverage and assemble any additional documentation that may support their case. This could include photographs, receipts, and written inspections from contractors. They can then speak to their insurance company and request that their claim is reviewed again or ask for a new examination based on new information.

If a claimant is still unhappy with the outcome, they can contact their state's insurance department to file a complaint and seek advice on further steps. They may also choose to hire an attorney to handle their claim, although this will incur additional costs.

Insurers may be inflating the cost of repairs

While it is not always the case that insurers are offering less to claimants, there is evidence to suggest that this is sometimes true. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has warned that some insurers may be systematically offering less-than-fair cash settlements to customers making 'total loss' claims (those whose cars have been stolen or written off). The FCA reviewed data from 12 insurance firms, reflective of around 70% of the market, and found that some firms' average settlement values were lower than available guide prices, indicating that some customers' claims may have been handled unfairly.

In addition, there is often disagreement between insurers and repair shops over the extent and cost of repairs. For example, the insurance company may claim that a part can be fixed, while the shop insists that it needs to be replaced. The insurer may also refuse to pay for original manufacturer's parts, instead opting for cheaper aftermarket versions. As a result, claimants may find that their insurance company won't cover the total price of a vehicle repair. In such cases, claimants have several options, including negotiating with the insurance company, accepting the company's offer, beginning arbitration with the insurance company, or consulting an attorney.

Insurers may be taking advantage of claimants' ignorance of the law

For example, insurance companies may attempt to delay or deny claims, redirect blame, or offer low settlement amounts, knowing that claimants may not be aware of their legal rights or the full extent of their coverage. In some cases, insurers may even engage in bad faith practices, such as denying a claim without providing a reason or delaying payment of a legitimate claim.

Additionally, insurance adjusters, who are trained to save money for their company, may use manipulative tactics to fish for information that could hurt the claimant's case or lead to a lower settlement offer. They may feign friendliness and concern for the claimant's well-being to encourage them to downplay the severity of their injuries or provide access to their medical records, which can then be used to reduce the value of the claim.

Furthermore, insurance companies have been criticized for charging higher premiums to unemployed individuals, who may be seen as higher credit risks or more likely to make fraudulent claims. This practice has been deemed discriminatory, especially considering that retired individuals, who may use their cars more frequently, are not subject to the same premium increases.

To protect themselves, claimants should consider seeking legal representation, carefully reviewing their insurance policies, and being cautious when dealing with insurance adjusters. By arming themselves with knowledge and understanding their rights, claimants can better navigate the claims process and avoid being taken advantage of by insurers.

Frequently asked questions