The Hidden Dangers Of Morale Hazards: Unraveling The Complexities In Insurance

A moral hazard is a situation in which a person with insurance takes greater risks than they normally would without insurance because they know that their insurer will cover any losses. Moral hazard can occur whenever two parties enter into an agreement, and one party has more information than the other.

The concept of moral hazard originated in the insurance industry, where companies worried that people would behave in riskier ways if they had an insurance policy. For example, a driver with car insurance may exercise less care while operating their vehicle than an individual without car insurance, knowing that the insurance company will pay the majority of the resulting economic costs if they have an accident.

Moral hazard is also common in the lending and insurance industries and can exist in employer-employee relationships. For instance, if an employee has a company car for which they do not have to pay for repairs or maintenance, they might be less likely to be careful and more likely to take risks with the vehicle.

Moral hazard in insurance vs adverse selection

In insurance, moral hazard and adverse selection refer to situations where one party is at a disadvantage due to the other party's behaviour or actions. Both concepts involve information asymmetry, where one party has more knowledge than the other. However, they differ in the timing of when this information asymmetry occurs.

Moral hazard occurs when there is asymmetric information between two parties, and the behaviour of one party changes after an agreement is reached. This happens when one party believes they will not face any consequences for their actions. For example, a person with home insurance may become less vigilant about home security and take fewer precautions against potential flooding once they are insured, increasing the risk of a claim being filed against the insurance company.

Adverse selection, on the other hand, refers to a situation where one party has more information than the other about some aspect of product quality before an agreement is made. Typically, the seller is the more knowledgeable party. Adverse selection occurs when this information asymmetry is exploited. For instance, in the context of life insurance, smokers (who have a higher risk of death) may be more inclined to purchase insurance if the price does not vary based on smoking status. As a result, the insurer faces higher claims and increasing costs to insure smokers.

The key distinction between moral hazard and adverse selection lies in the timing of the information asymmetry. In a moral hazard situation, the behaviour of one party changes after the agreement is reached, whereas in adverse selection, the information asymmetry exists prior to the agreement and is exploited by one party.

Both moral hazard and adverse selection have significant implications in economics, insurance, and risk management. They can lead to inefficient outcomes, increased costs, and reduced consumption. It is crucial for all parties to recognise and address these situations to mitigate potential disadvantages and ensure fair and informed agreements.

The history of the term moral hazard

The term "moral hazard" originated in the insurance industry and was widely used by English insurance companies by the late 19th century. Early usage of the term implied immoral behaviour or fraud, usually on the part of the insured party.

The concept of moral hazard, however, can be traced back to medieval theological and probability literature. During the Middle Ages, the Church considered random events to be outcomes of divine will and thus, events that could not be anticipated. As a result, insurance was seen as illicit. Over time, theological discourse shifted to focus on the insurer rather than the insured, debating whether insurance was a licit remedy for commercial costs resulting from acts of God. This debate centred on the question of whether the insurer was selling something that rightfully belonged to God and if safety could only be granted by God.

The development of the theory of probability in the 17th century also contributed to the evolution of the moral hazard concept. During this time, mathematical probabilists such as Huygens, Pascal, and Fermat analysed games of chance and introduced the concept of "expectation", which considered individual behaviour and its impact on uncertain outcomes. The recognition that individual characteristics could influence the likelihood of an uncertain event laid the foundation for understanding the role of individual behaviour in risk assessment.

In the 18th century, prominent mathematicians studying decision-making used the term "moral" to mean "subjective", further shaping the concept of moral hazard. By the 1960s, economists renewed their interest in the concept, with economist Ken Arrow being one of the first to study it without implying immoral behaviour or fraud. Instead, economists used the term to describe inefficiencies arising from displaced or unevaluated risks.

How to manage moral hazard

Moral hazard refers to a change in behaviour where an individual takes on greater risk because they know they are insured and will not bear the full consequences of their actions. This can lead to increased losses for the insurer.

There are several ways to manage moral hazard:

Incentives

Incentives can be offered to the risk-taking party to encourage more responsible behaviour. For example, in the context of employment, bonuses or long-term benefits can be used to motivate employees to take on more work and be more productive.

Policies

Policies can be instituted to discourage immoral behaviour and make it punishable. For example, in the context of health insurance, co-pays and deductibles can be implemented, requiring individuals to pay for a portion of the services they receive, thus discouraging them from seeking unnecessary or risky treatments.

Monitoring

Regular monitoring can help the party at risk of being taken advantage of to stay aware of the other party's actions and detect any suspicious or immoral behaviour. For instance, in the context of lending, the buyer can closely monitor the loan originators and verify loan quality to reduce the risk of moral hazard.

Moral hazard in health insurance

Moral hazard is a situation where one party to a contract assumes the risks associated with the other party without suffering any consequences. Moral hazard can be found in employee/employer relationships, in contracts between lenders and borrowers, and in the insurance industry between insurers and their clients.

In health insurance, moral hazard occurs when the behaviour of the insured party changes in a way that raises costs for the insurer since the insured party no longer bears the full costs of that behaviour. This can take two forms:

• Ex-ante moral hazard: the insured party behaves in a more risky manner, resulting in more negative consequences that the insurer must pay for. For example, after purchasing automobile insurance, some may tend to be less careful about locking their car or choose to drive more, thereby increasing the risk of theft or an accident for the insurer.
• Ex-post moral hazard: the insured party does not behave in a more risky manner but asks an insurer to pay for more of the negative consequences from risk as insurance coverage increases. For example, without medical insurance, some may forgo medical treatment due to its costs and simply deal with substandard health. However, after medical insurance becomes available, some may ask an insurance provider to pay for the cost of medical treatment that would not have occurred otherwise.

Reducing Moral Hazard in Health Insurance

Moral hazard can be reduced by increasing out-of-pocket spending for consumers, thereby reducing the incentive for the insured to engage in excessive consumption. This can be done through coinsurance, co-payments, and deductibles. These methods work by increasing out-of-pocket expenses for consumers, thereby reducing the incentive for the insured to engage in excessive consumption. For example, by requiring individuals to pay a portion of their health care costs through coinsurance, copayment, or deductibles, insurance providers can give people an incentive to consume less health care and avoid making unnecessary claims. This can help reduce moral hazard by aligning the interests of the insured and the insurer.

Moral hazard in sales

Moral hazard is a situation in economics where one party takes undue risks because they know another party will foot the bill for any negative consequences of their actions. This scenario often occurs when two parties enter a protection agreement, such as an insurance contract, and there is asymmetric information between them. In other words, one party has more knowledge about the potential risks than the other.

To mitigate moral hazard in sales, companies typically adopt performance-linked compensation plans for their sales teams. By tying a salesperson's earnings to their sales numbers through commissions and bonuses, companies can provide greater incentives for salespeople to work harder and avoid missed sales opportunities. This approach ensures that salespeople have "skin in the game," aligning their interests with those of the company.

While moral hazard in sales specifically relates to the compensation structure of salespeople, the broader concept of moral hazard can apply to various business contexts, including lending, insurance, and employee-employer relationships.

Frequently asked questions